Angela Merkel, Helen Clarke, Julia Gillard and Theresa May have all failed. They chose to have a career, they married or partnered, but have no children. They considered children an impediment instead of the future. I hope that Jacinda Adern, the leader of the Labour Party, will wife up her current partner and get knocked up: she will most likely be happier than negotiating and managing a coalition of greens, alt right and power hungry unionists
To compound this, most of them partnered with passive men.

Woman of God, consider them as warnings. For men have never been impressed by your credentials. They want a helpmeet, not a competitor. What attracts you does not attract them: men are another species.

Go and read the comments on the link for confirmation.

This is what happens when Man attempts to outwit Mother Nature. Speaking as a man who is, statistically speaking, more intelligent than 99.9 percent of the species, I can attest that I don’t particularly value female intelligence. The cognitive differences between a normal smart girl and an average girl is virtually undetectable to me, and the most noticeable difference is that the former tends to behave in a much more challenging manner, which is the real reason that men “would rather date a girl without a degree”.

It’s not about about the intelligence, the cleverness, or the credentials, but rather, the attitude that tends to come with it. Men know perfectly well how to deal with educated women: they avoid them. They do so because they want an attractive and pleasant companion, not an argumentative opponent trained by her professors to regard every conversational interaction as a formal debate.

The essential problem is that the combination of female solipsism with female hypergamy means that too many women now desire the logically impossible and the statistically improbable. Women are attracted to men who possess qualities of size, earning potential, education, and, yes, intelligence, that are superior to their own. That’s fine, but the problem is when they believe that men are attracted to the same thing.

And it’s a damn good thing we’re not, because if we were, no couple would ever pair off and get together, because if X > Y for Z, then Y !> X for Z. Mutual attraction would be logically impossible. These women, both young and not-so-young, have subscribed to a false and incoherent philosophy of romance that quite literally cannot exist and has rendered both their intelligences and their educations moot. Furthermore, as believe I was the first to point out more than a decade ago, the rising F/M ratio of women at institutions of higher learning mean that at least one-third of all college graduates cannot ever marry a man with equivalent or better academic credentials.

One of the smartest women who was on the blogosphere wrote this four years ago: what she hints at it that our political class is half aristocratic (who know they have to breed) and half villien eunuchs. No woman should assign herself there,but those who have embraced postmodern rainbow politics have fallen into a delusion strong enough to remove themselves from the gene pool.

I would add that the proleteriat are muslim immigrants, who will breed to keep the welfare payments going.

That’s fancy-speak for, “We’ve figured out that underemployed people have fewer children than fully employed people.” Specifically, that for every 1% rise in unemployment, the birth rate dropped by 0.1%-0.2% in the most fertile demographic in the countries examined. That may not sound very big, but some countries are facing 50% unemployment in that demographic. You do the math.
Basically, serf reproduction is becoming concentrated in the Freemen and Villein classes. Slaves can barely manage to feed themselves, and government-largess is drying up quickly, so they have little interest in bearing children now. Cottagers are still too busy trying to “make it” to settle down. The nobles are reproducing like rabbits, and the freemen are busily imitating their fairytale weddings and idyllic housekeeping, housewife and college funds included. Villeins are sort of tagging along and struggling to not be left behind. But the rest of them… not so much going on in those wombs.
There’s essentially a chain-reaction going on. Men can no longer afford wives and women can therefore no longer afford children. And the baby boom dries right up.
Not that it’s noticeable from the popular culture, which is now veritably obsessed with all-things baby.

What then to do? Live rightly, though it is neither subsidised or fashionable. Wife your man up and raise his kids. Be a Lady. Your existence will pour burning coals on the gender fluid and antifa, so in their tears bathe. And treat the current generation of female politicians as a useful example. Of what not to be. Conservative female eunuchs included.