I try to keep this as a family show: It may be NSFW but that should be because of ideology (or badthink) rather than indecency. So, the first quote was referred to in the second quote, and a hat tip to Vox Day, but I’ve removed a sentence or two. The gist remains.
The left have tried to make any opposition despair, knowing that despair has made them stop breeding. The personal is the political. And history is made by the next generation that turns up.
The best way to think about America, now and historically, is as the battleground between rival White factions, with nonwhites and women as shock troops ordered to exploit, respectively, White men’s racial guilt and their white knightery.
…This is not a recent invention. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the RU Whites (back then, Yankees of Quaker and Puritan blood) opened the borders to non-Anglo ethnic European immigration, seeking the same goal: defeat of their cousin FUs (loosely organized under the later umbrella term “WASP” for Anglo-Germanics, but including Southern and Appalachian Whites of Scots-Irish descent).
The RU Whites won a surrender and a temporary peace with the FU Whites in America’s first Civil War, but the ethnic faults and schisms persist, and have deepened since then, despite decades of “Diversity is our strength” propaganda.
The end game is the same: hot war. But RU Whites know they can’t win a shooting Civil War 2 now. So their strategy is demographic displacement. This is the strategic undercurrent that will strand a true “White nationalism” political platform from achieving social significance.
I’ve got flak for saying I’m remarrying. From some Catholics — and those people I respect, for they have a high standard for marriage and cannot see divorce — and from the hard men’s rights activists, who cannot understand that their will be wounded, and we still need to fight.
For our children. I’m at an age (as is the beloved) where starting another family is highly unlikely. But I have grandchildren, and I want to see more.
This is why MGTOW is not an option. It is a surrender. It is exactly what the RU-Whites want you to do. Yes, there is a real risk that marrying a white girl and having children with her will end up with you being divorce-raped. It is a risk that you have to take anyhow, for the same reason that a soldier in a shooting war has to take the risk of being shot.
There are casualties in every conflict.
Game helps you reduce the risk of becoming a casualty, but the risk is there for every man no matter what. But so what? Taking risks is what men do. Don’t live in fear, go out there and win the war for Western civilization.
Let’s face it, if you meet a girl who responds well to being taken by the hand and being told: “Come with me if you want Western civilization to live”, there is a good chance she is a keeper.
Well, I agree. The world needs to be peopled, and to do that we have to cleave. But what did Vox mean by game and is in needed? There are many definitions, but the one I think matters most is that you avoid contempt. Contempt is the marriage killer. Contempt makes duty — for in a marriage, you end up doing things you would rather not do, from weeding the garden to cleaning out the septic tank –cold.
Love makes duty sing. Game is about fertilizing love. It is earthy, like a good compost. But we are made of the dust of the earth. There is nothing wrong with this. The flaws we have are damage, they were not there by design.
In this age, romantic attraction and desire are part of what leads us into becoming a set of married couples. We don’t have a structure of tradition, duty and honour that steels our spine when times are difficult. We have to build it anew.
Yes, this is work, but everything worthwhile is difficult.
The conundrum for men in this case then is, you must first attract her (be sexy and a turn on) and also be a good provider and never stop being a perfect combination of both until the day you die. Otherwise, you face the loss of her. At 45, I still must do this with my wife every day and it is exhausting. I met her when I was 35, and she was 32 and if you hear her describe what attracted her to me in those first few moments, you will not hear “he was going to graduate school to be a psychologist.” She had not “outgrown her adolescent fascination with bad boys.” Its fun to play this game of keeping her interested, but it is hard work.
This is a message that men can hear. It is a message they can process and get to work on, but it is only half the problem. We can all name 10 men who have jobs, pay their bills, are not violent, ‘take care of business” but are lonely and single. Most have been divorced, had their kids taken away and are paying their future income for doing nothing more than being responsible, but flawed husbands, as Geraghty describes.
I have been a casualty in this war, one that we did not choose, but one thrust upon us by the agenda of this world. They do not want Magdalene to repent (which is the title of the painting at the top of the post). They do not want us to love each other, sharing all but our wives.
They do not want beauty. They do not want holiness. They do not want truth.
The want us to converge into some form of disembodied grey goo.
I would rather be human.
So let us fight. The risks are high. So is the reward.
I’m glad you posted this Chris, even with my quibbles. Since you and I are friends, so to speak, I know I can speak freely here. I’ll keep it short, sweet, and vow not to start any kind of comment war. No time for it anyway. I’ll refrain from any comment on the first quote because as usual, my family and I are the odd ones out in all this racial stuff. We are on the Lord’s side. Period.
As for marriage and game, I will tell you the research I did yesterday, which shows 1) that every marriage has its own dynamic:
Els: “Benevolent Dictator, do you have to work hard to keep my interest?”
Benevolent Dictator: “No, I have to work hard to keep up with your interest.”
So there’s that. Lastly:
Here’s the thing Chris. any good spouse understands that he -or she- should do the things that show their mate that they are still interested, engaged, and attracted.
The breakdown I am having here is with assertion that 1) only the husband needs to do this (I don’t run, diet, stay available and cook his favorite dishes just for myself), or 2) that it requires constant game from the husband with no showing of human frailty or need.
Follow up (more research, lol):
In a normal healthy marriage the level of interest sometimes swings. Right now the Benevolent Dictator is working less, less stressed, more relaxed. Higher interest.
Other times the pendulum swings and wife has to do her part to stoke interest.
No one should have to be a perfect combination of anything for decades on end to keep their mate. Especially Christians. And BD refuses to internalize the notion that he has to perform to keep his wife. I can get to stepping’ if I need all that.
‘Kay. Last words.
Hope waking up to my monologue isn’t too much, Chris, :).
It’s one thing for a husband to do all the things to make a wife feel loved and protected because he is motivated by love as well as marital duty. It’s a totally different -and more sinister- for a man to do these things out of some fear of his wife losing interest, leaving, or otherwise disengaging from the marriage.
That is (not my words) “the exact opposite of loving from a place of a authority.”
The fear thing exists, E. It is a result of our fallen nature. Now, given that Scott and I do talk at times, I’m pretty sure that he loves Mychael and he does these things for love.
But he works in psychology, with a bunch of Social Justice Political Officers. He sees the other side — including the women who divorce men when on deployment (the joke that you cannot make Staff Sergeant unless you have two failed marriages cuts close to the bone). He’s doing something important enough that he feels it is his duty, otherwise he would not be in Texas, but on his farm.
Inside a marriage, it is love. It has to be love. But we have forgotten how to keep the love going. You are a good example of how to do this, as is your husband.
The bigger issue is that many men and women are just giving up. They are not prepared to take the risk. And that is a convergence with the evil one.
Have a great day Chris and thanks for the indulgence!
You’re engaged, then? Or hoping to be? The photographress?
The reason that casa pukeko is being left is that we are getting married early next year and moving to casa weka
Pingback: Have confidence and continue [Jude 1] | Dark Brightness
Now, given that Scott and I do talk at times, I’m pretty sure that he loves Mychael and he does these things for love.
I absolutely, positively believe that. I also believe Mychael’s flight risk is probably minuscule to nonexistent even if Scott didn’t do all those things.
And that’s why statements like the one you quoted are too extreme, lack nuance,and feeding into the already heightened fear level some of the men who read these sites deal with.
“So let us fight”. Fight who? Fight how? With what weapons?
The ideological and cultural fight is over. Feminist and the alpha male overlords are doing victory laps. They have an army of heavily armed white knights champing at the bit to gleefully do their bidding. This army is your militarized local police force populated with low IQ sociopaths. Violence by proxy is their speciality.
They employ the tried and true predation tactics of the wolf pack. Keep the herd in a constant state of fear by singling out individuals for destruction, sending the message loud and clear. Obey or die. But the individual members of the herd don’t understand that it is not a question of if, but when, they are the wolves next meal.
The only way out of this mess is armed rebellion by the embattled farmers against the police state. Which is doomed to failure. We will have shotguns, pistols, and a few AR-15s. Your local police thugs have fully automatic rifles, flak jackets, helmets, and ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIERS. The only force in America capable of defeating the police state is the Army or maybe the National Guard. Thomas Jefferson is spinning in his grave.
So, I ask you again. Fight who, and how, with what?
The fact that you are marrying again proves beyond any doubt your pathetic need for female and societal validation of your ego. Let me know when you are locked and loaded and I will join you on the ramparts. Otherwise, you are merely fighting a war of ideas that is already lost.
Five bucks says that you will not post this comment. Cheers.
Pingback: The fight is ideological and mimetic [Eph 6] | Dark Brightness