Truth and thoughtful liturgy not churchian emergent murk.

Captain Capitalism has left the church and now lives with the fruits of nihilism: a clear minded despair and misanthropy moderated by the use of cheap liquor. But he is correct about the church: in it’s attempts to be relevant and caring it has become drippy. Grerp commented at his site wisely, and it is worth repeating in full

There were very few guys in my youth group by the time I was a senior in 1988-89, which predates his timeline a little.

Both of the women youth pastors I’ve known and worked with were hot messes – up and down (mostly down), emotional, food bingeing, perpetually single.

The music in Protestant churches has really gone downhill too. Now it’s all 7/11 choruses (the same seven words sung eleven times). Hands in the air, accompanied by electric piano or (shudder) drums.
The old hymns frequently had “battle” language – A Mighty Fortress Is Our God, Lead On, O King Eternal, Onward, Christian Soldiers, Battle Hymn of the Republic, Lift High the Cross. The Catholic church I attend now is about 50% men, and not just old men either. We don’t have so many teens, but we’ve got quite a few Gen Xers, and I think it’s the liturgy. That traditional man-in-the-pulpit, alter boys, candles, incense, stained glass thing seems to appeal to men. We also have GREAT music – classical compositions sung and played, pipe organ music, occasional Gregorian chant. The thing about youth group is that girls will go even if it gets pretty drippy, but they lose enthusiasm without the boys too. It’s not just the boys who don’t respond well to female-led Churchianity.

I think it is the liturgy as well. The old Divines knew what they were doing: most of the Puritians and Presbyterians who wrote the Book of Common Prayer in one generation and the Westminster confession with the associated book of order in the next were ministering to their local congregation, good theologians, and poets. They read aloud what they wrote to make sure it was clear, consistent and correct.  But liturgy alone will not save us. Consider this, from an excellent article called 5 Reasons why the emergent church is receding by Trevin Wax

Unfortunately, some Emerging Churches look like the continuation of the Seeker movement, even as they decry the Seeker-focused mindset. Incense, candles, icons. These aspects of worship might be helpful for ministry to postmodernists somewhere. They would look silly in rural Tennessee. Contextualization does not always look the same, something the Emerging Church conversation affirms in theory, but often ignores in practice.

Now that the Emerging Church is becoming known a “style of worship” or a “way of doing church for young people,” the movement has moved out of the realm of contextualization and has joined the evangelical faddishness it once protested.

Think of Jesus Movement of the 1970?s. Replace Vietnam with Iraq, beards with goatees, and contemporary music with liturgy.

Now Jesus was interested in telling the truth. Let’s recall for a second the context here. He had fed thousands — probably around four thousand families — miraculously. Now people wanted to (a) see a sign and (b) be fed by him forever. But he is talking about what he has to do to save the world.

He is using their metaphor — feed us as Moses did Manna in the desert — but he is looking to the day when he will die for us all. For he has stood in our place and taken our punishment. And this was seen as anathema. People hated this teaching. People fell away. In droves. But Jesus continued to teach it.

John 6:41-51

41Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” 42They were saying, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?” 43Jesus answered them, “Do not complain among yourselves. 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day. 45It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me. 46Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. 47Very truly, I tell you, whoever believes has eternal life. 48I am the bread of life. 49Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

 

One of the simple rules you learn in IT is “Don’t do it again”. If you have killed your OS by forgetting the dot when removing logs from the root account: reinstall, restore and you have learnt what not to do. Instead to it the correct way. In the same way… one of the things we do at work is say at times that psychotherapy is contraindicated. The patient has had years of therapy, but does not know how to cope with stress: teach coping skills — relaxation, mindfulness, and scheduling activity and exercise — then, one the person can cope with day to day life well reconsider looking at their deep hurts.

It is fairly clear that we have, across many denominations (because I am aware, for example, of Catholics who sing what Grerp called 7/11 choruses and Presbyterians who have choirs singing Chant) moved towards being popular with our audience. We have let women seek promotion and status: and they have removed “in the name of non violence” all songs and teaching about spiritual warfare, courage and duty.

And we wonder why the only men left are wimps. We need to leave the faddish behind and look at what we used to do. The older missionaries knew this as they contextualized worship for all peoples — from Xhosa to Korea to Tonga — but kept the doctrines and practices of the church intact.

The good news is they wrote what they did. And there is no copyright on this stuff.

My boys attend church not youth group.

At church on Sunday our minister recalled being converted by the Boys’ Brigade: in fact we attended the same international camp once, but I did not know it. Now, I enjoyed the Brigade, I tolerated the drill, liked photography and electronics, and enjoyed the post meeting game with no name (think a rugby scrum crossed with Calvin Ball) we played with our leaders.

It was not politically correct. Neither was youth group: we hung out together, went to dances and meetings together, and generally had fun.

My boys hate youth groups. It is all singing and feelings. It is all about development and not about God.  They like Parachute (because of the bands) and they like church (because no one asks you to do special stuff, and Jesus is preached there).  Demanding that they go to Youth Group would drive them away.

David Murrow has just talked about this, but he understates the seriousness of the situation. I am a highly verbal theology geek who plays fretted instruments competently and is learning string instruments. One son argues theology back, and the other is much more musically talented than I am.  And they both hate youth group. They hate being verbal about their feelings. And they hate being led by women.

Our church is led by a man, and does not require any age group to leave the building — the young are in the service, as are the old. And the boys love that.

The old, strong ways work. The woofly 20th century pseudoeducational system of age appropriate teaching should be abandoned. I find cooperative therapeutic churches nauseating, and I do talking therapy as part of my job.

Children can grasp the divine, and a little bit of teaching them as the service goes on never hurt anyone.  And a bit of murderball or bullrush before the service will calm the young lads down as they contemplate a fresh set of bruises.

Hat tip: Captain Capitalism

At the time of the start of the year.

Well, like most people I need to be paid. Yes, there is some money stashed away, but I don’t have a trust fund, and it is unlikely that I will have one in my generation. The next… may. But work has a dignity: without work many of us fall apart.

So this morning the holidays end for me — and I had mine later than most. The school year starts: Businesses ramp up, because the long summer break is over and most people are back for the year. The results of  last year are now history: for February for New Zealand is as September is for the Northern Hemisphere: the start of the academic cycle. And so we come to this.

John 6:27-40

27Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For it is on him that God the Father has set his seal.” 28Then they said to him, “What must we do to perform the works of God?” 29Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.” 30So they said to him, “What sign are you going to give us then, so that we may see it and believe you? What work are you performing? 31Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’” 32Then Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33For the bread of God is that which comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” 34They said to him, “Sir, give us this bread always.”

35Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. 36But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. 37Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and anyone who comes to me I will never drive away; 38for I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me. 39And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day.

Now here it becomes interesting. We are not to work for food? This has to be a bit of hyperbole. Jesus was not going to give everyone manna for ever. Yes, Jesus had fed crowds, but he was not going to do this every day. Most people got food by growing it. Which takes effort and expense if you do it yourself and takes more effort and expense if you go to the supermarket: As Paul said, you you do not work you should not eat.. However, work in and of itself is not the aim, the kingdom of heaven is.

Secondly, we are told to do the will of God. Which ties in with yesterday: we are to choose each day to walk in the spirit and discipline our fleshly desires of greed, lust, wrath. We are not to live for ourselves but those who are around us.

Thirdly, this teaching around the bread of life led to many falling way. They saw this as blasphemous at best and an invocation to cannibalism at worst. Now, Jesus chose to use the two common elements of a meal — bread and wine — as symbols of his death which we continue to do in obedience to his word: offending the secular on a weekly basis.

Finally, it is God’s will that those he chose (for you can read this as applying to those predestined and also as a call to preach to everyone) he will hold. Our salvation comes through Christ alone and the preservation of our salvation comes through Christ alone. Or as someone said to me at Church yesterday… “If you get your Christology wrong, you get everything wrong

Today I face a new year, a moved ward, and tasks to do. May I not lose sight that the kingdom is in this, and it is my job today to do God’s will, not mine.

Righteous acts, not nice words.

I note that in the comments that some of my old friends have been commenting, along with Brendan on the issue of liturgy. But this is an issue where there are going to be multiple styles.

I grew up in Mangere, Papatoetoe and Otahuhu. My parents were elders in the local Presbyterian church: we had a pastor who did pray and teach — pitching his sermons at primary school level, because we had a large number of Samoans, Tongans and other immigrants who had limited education.  But we chose to not split along ethnic lines: this was the tendency. I spent enough time visiting — and the very style of the service was quite different in the Pacific Island churches.

Same theology. Different styles.

Now, I am aware that the traditional Catholics and Orthodox are very cautious about their liturgies, and this is not unwise. For their liturgy is written, and it is easy for syncretic influences to creep in. Keeping things as they are, being explicit about symbols is Roman and Orthodox. But it is not Reformed, or low church Presbyterian. Our style is plain. And this is not the issue.

The issue is that we have stopped being salt, and light. We need to be the contrast to the world around us. We need to be living differently. We need to be raising sane children, preserving our marriages, and enjoying this.

Consider, for a second, Sodom. Now the sins of Sodom included sexual ones, economic injustice, and ritually occultic practices. But Abraham said but ten men who are righteous would preserve the people. But there was really only one: and he was Lot, who had his own problems with his daughters (both of whom conceived children by him once he was drunk: one wonders where they got that idea from).

Genesis 18:16-33

16Then the men set out from there, and they looked toward Sodom; and Abraham went with them to set them on their way. 17The LORD said, “Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do, 18seeing that Abraham shall become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? 19No, for I have chosen him, that he may charge his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing righteousness and justice; so that the LORD may bring about for Abraham what he has promised him.” 20Then the LORD said, “How great is the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah and how very grave their sin! 21I must go down and see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry that has come to me; and if not, I will know.”

22So the men turned from there, and went toward Sodom, while Abraham remained standing before the LORD. 23Then Abraham came near and said, “Will you indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked? 24Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city; will you then sweep away the place and not forgive it for the fifty righteous who are in it? 25Far be it from you to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from you! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?” 26And the LORD said, “If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I will forgive the whole place for their sake.” 27Abraham answered, “Let me take it upon myself to speak to the Lord, I who am but dust and ashes. 28Suppose five of the fifty righteous are lacking? Will you destroy the whole city for lack of five?” And he said, “I will not destroy it if I find forty-five there.” 29Again he spoke to him, “Suppose forty are found there.” He answered, “For the sake of forty I will not do it.” 30Then he said, “Oh do not let the Lord be angry if I speak. Suppose thirty are found there.” He answered, “I will not do it, if I find thirty there.” 31He said, “Let me take it upon myself to speak to the Lord. Suppose twenty are found there.” He answered, “For the sake of twenty I will not destroy it.” 32Then he said, “Oh do not let the Lord be angry if I speak just once more. Suppose ten are found there.” He answered, “For the sake of ten I will not destroy it.” 33And the LORD went his way, when he had finished speaking to Abraham; and Abraham returned to his place.

Now, God calls us to be righteous. Not perfect: Lot wasn’t. David wasn’t. But to follow him. And part of this is what we feed ourselves. Do we look here, or do we instead listen to the pagan gospel of prosperity and self fulfillment? For if we follow the teaching of this world, we will become like this world. And this world is quite unjust, harsh and demanding on the narod but will forgive anything if you are favoured, part of the nomenkultura.

Galatians 5:13-25

13For you were called to freedom, brothers and sisters; only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for self-indulgence, but through love become slaves to one another. 14For the whole law is summed up in a single commandment, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” 15If, however, you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another. 16Live by the Spirit, I say, and do not gratify the desires of the flesh. 17For what the flesh desires is opposed to the Spirit, and what the Spirit desires is opposed to the flesh; for these are opposed to each other, to prevent you from doing what you want. 18But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not subject to the law. 19Now the works of the flesh are obvious: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, 20idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions, 21envy, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these. I am warning you, as I warned you before: those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

22By contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, 23gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against such things. 24And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. 25If we live by the Spirit, let us also be guided by the Spirit.

Now, this does not mean that we disavow the flesh. We have bodies, and we need to enjoy them and take care of them. As Lewis said, I have got my body into more problems than my body has got me… but this needs to be controlled, as does our entire life. For living uncontrolled does not merely damage us. It damages all those around us. We need to think of those in our congregation. It is not the word that offends, but our example. Paul puts this quite neatly.

1 Corinthians 8:1-13

Since some have become so accustomed to idols until now, they still think of the food they eat as food offered to an idol; and their conscience, being weak, is defiled. 8“Food will not bring us close to God.” We are no worse off if we do not eat, and no better off if we do. 9But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak. 10For if others see you, who possess knowledge, eating in the temple of an idol, might they not, since their conscience is weak, be encouraged to the point of eating food sacrificed to idols? 11So by your knowledge those weak believers for whom Christ died are destroyed. 12But when you thus sin against members of your family, and wound their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. 13Therefore, if food is a cause of their falling, I will never eat meat, so that I may not cause one of them to fall.

We are called to be devoted to God. We are called to influence those around us. The church should be correcting society, not being corrected by society. At times we need to be offensive, because being inoffensive would leave  our brothers and sisters in grievous error, endangering their souls. But we need to act with grace.

And we cannot do this, within the church or anywhere else, in our own power. For the snark will overwhelm us and we will either become a place of querulous conflict or an echo chamber with no bite. And I would prefer neither happen.

Hold to our faith. For there is none other.

I was married for many years, and one of the accusations the ex threw at me constantly was “You are just Catholic. You confess something, and you do it again”. Well, she was right: like all of us I have habits of sin that I struggle with. They do not go away as you get older. But she is wrong.

For here the reformed agree with the Papists. We are all fallen. Our hope is not in what we do, for we will only be able to reform ourselves by the work of the spirit. We need to continually turn to the cross for this is our hope.

Hebrews 10:26-36

26For if we willfully persist in sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries. 28Anyone who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy “on the testimony of two or three witnesses.” 29How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by those who have spurned the Son of God, profaned the blood of the covenant by which they were sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace? 30For we know the one who said, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge his people.” 31It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

32But recall those earlier days when, after you had been enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings, 33sometimes being publicly exposed to abuse and persecution, and sometimes being partners with those so treated. 34For you had compassion for those who were in prison, and you cheerfully accepted the plundering of your possessions, knowing that you yourselves possessed something better and more lasting. 35Do not, therefore, abandon that confidence of yours; it brings a great reward.36For you need endurance, so that when you have done the will of God, you may receive what was promised.

The question of what willingly persist in sin means needs unpacking. None of us is righteous — we need to choose today to do good (but we cannot undo the wrong we did yesterday). And we all have error, and we need to take sin seriously and keep short accounts of our sin.

But Christ accepts us as we are. We need to change, but this is to please him. This is why confession requires repentance and contrition.  It is not cheap, it is costly. And if we fail… we pray that instead of condemning us, our brothers and sisters will pick us up. So we hold to the faith we have been given, at such great cost.

How the emerging church gets it wrong.

Most of the commentators here come from the stone age branch of traditionalism. They are traditional Christians… believing (and tiving) what has been called the old, strong religion. Now, we have considerable differences, but as we live in a fallen age the practical issues that exist around keeping a family together and holy mean that the Catholic housewife is talking with an Orthodox steel worker… and the reformed.  Now, on some things, it does not matter. My congregation uses the lectionary, has candles, and sings modern songs. But the teaching is reformed and quite Scottish: we look at Iona as well as the auld Kirk.But as James MacDonald says, that is no reason for woolly thinking.

Candles and bells, paintings and sculpture, incense and chanting–great! Let’s bring back the best of all those offerings of worship, but let’s not confuse style and substance. According to Jesus it’s still truth that sets you free, not artistic expression. Wearing suits and ties is certainly not necessary and it can be contrived and unnatural, but wearing jeans and sandals is not a means to the revealed presence of Christ. John 14:21 teaches that obedience to the substance of Christ’s teaching brings His “manifest presence,” not forms–old or new. In most of these discussions we are simply inserting an ancient-dead form in place of a modern-dead one

 

Now this is the second attempt to do this. The hotel ISP destroyed the first draft at around 7 am when I tried to post it in Wellington, it’s now around 10 pm and I’m in Dunedin. What I want to look at a bit is the Hebrews text from today.

Hebrews 10:11-25

11And every priest stands day after day at his service, offering again and again the same sacrifices that can never take away sins. 12But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, “he sat down at the right hand of God,” 13and since then has been waiting “until his enemies would be made a footstool for his feet.” 14For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. 15And the Holy Spirit also testifies to us, for after saying,

16“This is the covenant that I will make with them

after those days, says the Lord:

I will put my laws in their hearts,

and I will write them on their minds,”

17he also adds,

“I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more.”

18Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin.

19Therefore, my friends, since we have confidence to enter the sanctuary by the blood of Jesus, 20by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain (that is, through his flesh), 21and since we have a great priest over the house of God, 22let us approach with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. 23Let us hold fast to the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who has promised is faithful. 24And let us consider how to provoke one another to love and good deeds, 25not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

It is fairly obvious that there are three points I want to discuss.

Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin. My Catholic readers may wonder what the stumbling blocks are for the reformed in their doctrine. If I ignore the fact that I frequently praise God that he is not a canon lawyer, there are two big ones: the immaculate conception of Mary and transubstantiation. Jesus died once. for all. And he is our priest. There is no other, and since in him our sins are ablated there is no need for sacrifice.  Now, the reformed do state clearly that communion is a sacrament by which we proclaim the death of Christ and his saving grace… which we do in obedience to him. But we use symbols.  Now, although I have not highlighted the text, only Christ has been a perfect human. Mary, his mother, is to be honoured for her courage and her obedience, but she, like us all, sinned.

Let us hold fast to the confession of our hope without wavering. This is what I am afraid the emergents have lost. The gospel is not theatre, it is not technique, but it is the power of God. Here we can learn from the orthodox and catholic…  hold onto that which is essential. Hold onto the creeds. The liturgical churches make you read set psalms and bible readings. The reformers did not… but there was a tradition of expository preaching through the bible. And then publishing polished notes as commentaries — that had been tested in real life. We need the bible proclaimed, not a commentary on the latest movie or magazine article.

And let us consider how to provoke one another to love and good deeds, 2not neglecting to meet together…  Over the last few months I have blogged the lectionary… and occasionally snarled about other topics. That has led to arguments and discussions. All to the good. We need a Christian blogosphere that  critiques not accommodates our society in cyberspace. But I still need to meet in real life, with a real congregation. Even though I hate, hate gathering with people and force myself to do it.  Because there is something much more powerful and direct about being confronted by a brother… than a comment here.

In the end, we are supposed to be different; here and in the other aspects of our life.

Starvation in the Church.

One of the current fads within the church is innovation, marketing, simplification.  Now, the Gospel is simple. But applying, it, like many simple things, is incredibly difficult. The teaching elder needs to spend a fair amount of time in exegesis… struggling with his Greek, his Hebrew, and at times his Latin to consider what the text means,

For that does not change. But if he does not preach that, and then apply it to the lives of the congregation, he is not doing his job.

John 5:30-47

30“I can do nothing on my own. As I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just, because I seek to do not my own will but the will of him who sent me.

31“If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. 32There is another who testifies on my behalf, and I know that his testimony to me is true. 33You sent messengers to John, and he testified to the truth. 34Not that I accept such human testimony, but I say these things so that you may be saved. 35He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. 36But I have a testimony greater than John’s. The works that the Father has given me to complete, the very works that I am doing, testify on my behalf that the Father has sent me. 37And the Father who sent me has himself testified on my behalf. You have never heard his voice or seen his form, 38and you do not have his word abiding in you, because you do not believe him whom he has sent.

39“You search the scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that testify on my behalf. 40Yet you refuse to come to me to have life.

Now, one of the things that the congregation will do is stray. To that which is comfortable. No one wants to get out of bed and doe the uncomfortable things… but every parent has done this, repeatedly, to a babe. For we in love do what is needed.

(Note: there is nothing, nothing here which is protestant. The reformers already knew how to preach, because those before them had done so for generations.

But if you just do the simple stuff it is like feeding nothing but cheezo. It will assuage hunger, but without substance, you will still starve.  A good test is reproof — if you are not confronting your own sin and those around you are not doing your job.

This sheep, you see, is starving. He needs to be fed. Fortunately, he can read… but reading theology does not replace solid preaching: we are saved together and we  starve together, and you cannot cure this with a mere reading list.

To obey is to worship.

Over the last few years there has been a revolution in what we do in church. This is of some interest to me: locally almost every church has been influenced by the music of hillsong, and my sons are both looking forward to the Parachute Festival, which starts for them tomorrow.  I enjoy the music and the skill of the performers, but this kind of worship can turn into a passive rock concert given by the professional musicians who lead it.

Worship matters. In the older, confessing churches, the liturgy is written. In Dunedin, this includes most of the Presbyterian churches.  There is a resistance within this to the newer songs, but the same issues relating to professionalism and skills occur — in the choir and in the clergy.

Hebrews 9:24-28

24For Christ did not enter a sanctuary made by human hands, a mere copy of the true one, but he entered into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. 25Nor was it to offer himself again and again, as the high priest enters the Holy Place year after year with blood that is not his own; 26for then he would have had to suffer again and again since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the age to remove sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27And just as it is appointed for mortals to die once, and after that the judgment, 28so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.

John 5:19-29

19Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, the Son can do nothing on his own, but only what he sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise. 20The Father loves the Son and shows him all that he himself is doing; and he will show him greater works than these, so that you will be astonished. 21Indeed, just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whomever he wishes. 22The Father judges no one but has given all judgment to the Son, 23so that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Anyone who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him. 24Very truly, I tell you, anyone who hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life, and does not come under judgment, but has passed from death to life.

25“Very truly, I tell you, the hour is coming, and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. 26For just as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself; 27and he has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of Man. 28Do not be astonished at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29and will come out — those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.

What does today’s readings say? There is a pattern for worship, and we on this planet do not and cannot follow this pattern completely. But Jesus, who can, talked more about obedience.

To obey God is to worship God. But this can be drowned out by the rock concert. Or the quieter aesthetic of Bach. It is not what we sing, but what we do.

Mercy trumps regulation

We live in an over regulated world, where best practice limits our ability to do good. Jesus practice was different.

John 5:1-11

1After this there was a festival of the Jews, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.

2Now in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate there is a pool, called in Hebrew Beth-zatha, which has five porticoes. 3In these lay many invalids — blind, lame, and paralyzed. 4 5One man was there who had been ill for thirty-eight years. 6When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had been there a long time, he said to him, “Do you want to be made well?” 7The sick man answered him, “Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up; and while I am making my way, someone else steps down ahead of me.” 8Jesus said to him, “Stand up, take your mat and walk.” 9At once the man was made well, and he took up his mat and began to walk.

Now that day was a sabbath. 10So the Jews said to the man who had been cured, “It is the sabbath; it is not lawful for you to carry your mat.” 11But he answered them, “The man who made me well said to me, ‘Take up your mat and walk.’”

 

Healing someone is more important than the regulation. Mercy is more important than best practice. It is a good principle to ignore the bureau, and simply do our duty.

The boot stamping on our face is progressive

I am noting in the last couple of days a few disturbing trends. The megauploard case is being flogged by the opposition (on the basis of a Virginia grand jury. The people are charged under US law and arrested to face charges there. The site allowed file sharing in the cloud. Like canoncial, apple, microsoft and google do… but their executives don’t have their houses raided. Let’s hit German expats in New Zealand instead).

In other news, Rand Paul, the senator, has been detained by the TSA.

Ron Paul’s presidential campaign released a strongly worded statement Monday afternoon, blistering the TSA for its practices.

“The police state in this country is growing out of control. One of the ultimate embodiments of this is the TSA that gropes and grabs our children, our seniors and our loved ones and neighbors with disabilities. The TSA does all of this while doing nothing to keep us safe,” it said.

The incident was first disclosed by the senator’s spokesperson on Twitter.

“Just got a call from @senrandpaul. He’s currently being detained by TSA in Nashville,” read her tweet just minutes later, at 9:59 A.M.

Like his father, Rand Paul has libertarian leanings and has been a fierce critic of TSA’s pat-downs of passengers at airports, which he views as government overreach. The senator grilled TSA Administrator John Pistole last year after a 6-year-old girl from Paul’s hometown, was patted down by airport security.

Now, I generally get worried when the progressives, who preach personal freedom, or freedom from responsibility, get into power. Because the FBI, TSA, NZ Police and other law enforcement bodies get politicized and impede our freedom to travel, and to think. You now breathe freer in Germany than in the USA
We live in times where the progessives smell like fascists..