Gak.

Had a phone call from a shipping agency a while ago. Got a parcel (of stuff) from (someone) that magically got over the $370 threshold for duty. Being delivered, so they needed me to authorise payment for GST and fees (with more GST) and duty.

$130. Gak. Nothing I can do about this but pay for it.

But this is minor. Dalrock’s post (which I linked to yesterday, but today I read more comments — documents in the comments the laws around the family court in the USA are biased against men.  Now, some people (well Jezebel and the feminist harpies) think this is great:

There’s another “if/then” dynamic at play in this debate over single motherhood. As the authors of Promises I Can Keep write, if — and it’s a huge “if” — society wants to encourage more women to get hitched before having children, “then the only course for those who want to promote marriage is to try improving the quality of male partners in the pool.”

Men don’t need to be “improved” because they’ve gotten demonstrably worse; rather, the standards for what makes a man marriage material have grown exponentially higher, even in the eyes of young moms struggling to stay above the poverty line. In that light, rising rates of single motherhood reflect undeniable progress for women.

But a quiet librarian observes something else.

John’s story made me very angry. Theft is theft; we should all feel outraged for him. And to lose your kids – that has to be the heaviest hurt. My first instinct is to repeat Flavia’s advice, but perhaps he has other things holding him here.

My cub scout den has 12 second-grade boys; only 7 are from intact families. The pack is sponsored by a Catholic school. Obviously, neither the middle class nor the Catholic Church has done a great job of holding the line on divorce and single motherhood. A couple of these boys are in situations that are far from ideal; I worry for them, but cannot do much. Their mothers made some very selfish choices, a pattern that looks to continue.

Now, I could get snarky here. It is very easy. But instead let’s just lay down some simple old teachings.

  1. Marriage is about children. It is thus, not about the wedding (fun for the girl), the associated  parties (fun for the guy) the sex (fun for both). It is about raising children, and that is not fun. It is bloody hard work. The times that you are not exhausted, tired, and frazzled and can talk to each other when the kids are small are few and preciously cherished. Sex is one of those things that keep you together — bot only one.
  2. You damage children when you divorce. They don’t grow. They regress. You do the best you can, and work for their best interest, and pray that the damage is minimised. (Yes. I am divorced. Yes, I am a solo Dad, and I’m told by others I’m reasonable at it. But all my children have been damaged by separation and divorce. And I have to live with those consequences.
  3. The elite lie. They state that having a degree is a sign of success, not a sign of debt. As the Captain points out, it is not the degree, but the major that counts. Men may not have a BA after their name… but they may have a trade. Because in the end, it is called work for a reason. So measuring success by the number of letters after your name is a fool’s game. Ask instead if you are at peace, your family is fed, and if your children are doing well.
  4. You will not trade up. If you leave, you will not find a man (or woman) of the same value, simply because you are now a decade older and have baggage. Which is the second error that the single mom’s make: most men don’t want to raise the other bastard’s children, and most men look carefully at divorced women thinking “If she left him, she will probably leave me”. In addition, you are no longer at the peak of your beauty. (He is not either, but he knows that ).   Now, I know exceptions. But even then, the emotional cost to those women is huge — and most of the exceptions I know were left by their husbands… and their new partner knows that she was the one not at fault. But the odds of you finding the man from the romance novels is quite low.  Many decent men know the odds — and are choosing not to re-engage with western women, particularly American women.

Men are simple. Be nice. Take care of some of their needs — and tell them yours. Do not assume they read minds (they don’t) or understand exactly why this works or that does not (they definitely don’t). Men are not your Best Friend of the Female persuasion.

The good news is that men do not want you to be their drinking buddy — they want you to be a girl.  Only the most brainwashed products of second-rate universities consider men and women interchangeable.  If you choose to marry a man, accept him, don’t try to neuter him. For if you succeed, you will not like the results.

The imp of the Reformed.

They do not preach that their God will rouse them a
  little before the nuts work loose.
They do not teach that His Pity allows them to drop
  their job when they dam'-well choose.
As in the thronged and the lighted ways, so in the dark
  and the desert they stand,
Wary and watchful all their days that their brethren's
  day may be long in the land.
                          Sons of Martha, Rudyard Kipling.

One of the facts of this life is that if one makes a resolution or a vow — even on minor things — the temptation to break it is great. Trivial stuff. I generally only buy Lattes from the coffee shop because they last longer in meetings than short blacks — but since I’ve decided to put that money into charity for this season suddenly I have coffee fantasies. And the imp of the reformed says that I am but a closet papist.

It is the same with more serious things. Try to live righteously, and you fail. But in the spirit. But we are accountable for our actions.

Ezekiel 18: 25-32

25Yet you say, “The way of the Lord is unfair.” Hear now, O house of Israel: Is my way unfair? Is it not your ways that are unfair? 26When the righteous turn away from their righteousness and commit iniquity, they shall die for it; for the iniquity that they have committed they shall die. 27Again, when the wicked turn away from the wickedness they have committed and do what is lawful and right, they shall save their life. 28Because they considered and turned away from all the transgressions that they had committed, they shall surely live; they shall not die. 29Yet the house of Israel says, “The way of the Lord is unfair.” O house of Israel, are my ways unfair? Is it not your ways that are unfair?

30Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, all of you according to your ways, says the Lord GOD. Repent and turn from all your transgressions; otherwise iniquity will be your ruin.31Cast away from you all the transgressions that you have committed against me, and get yourselves a new heart and a new spirit! Why will you die, O house of Israel? 32For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone, says the Lord GOD. Turn, then, and live.

Now, there is no way that I can deal with my besetting faults and errors, my favourite acts of evil, by myself.  The things that don’t bother me — easy. As an example, gambling leaves me cold. Don’t care. But anger… anger gets me, and I have made more than a few sarcastic tweets and intemperate comments when it becomes unbalanced. Or I fall into the error of saying that anger itself is wrong, when it is instead at times right and proper.

But back to the imp of the Reformed. Our besetting error is division. We divide on finer and finer points. We don’t understand that one can argue but remain in relationship — or we get too good at destroying relationships with our words.

John 17:9-19

9I am asking on their behalf; I am not asking on behalf of the world, but on behalf of those whom you gave me, because they are yours. 10All mine are yours, and yours are mine; and I have been glorified in them. 11And now I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one, as we are one. 12While I was with them, I protected them in your name that you have given me. I guarded them, and not one of them was lost except the one destined to be lost, so that the scripture might be fulfilled. 13But now I am coming to you, and I speak these things in the world so that they may have my joy made complete in themselves. 14I have given them your word, and the world has hated them because they do not belong to the world, just as I do not belong to the world. 15I am not asking you to take them out of the world, but I ask you to protect them from the evil one. 16They do not belong to the world, just as I do not belong to the world. 17Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth. 18As you have sent me into the world, so I have sent them into the world. 19And for their sakes I sanctify myself, so that they also may be sanctified in truth.

We can take some hope from this prayer. Firstly, it is not our job to preserve the Church. We can’t do it. We fall into error. We divide, or we become lukewarm because of the compromises we make and ignore the functional unity we have.  Secondly, it is not our job to preserve us from the evil one. Again, we will be tempted by the evil desires of our own hearts — let alone the external forces of evil that surround us. Christ preserved his disciples while he was in the world: the Holy Spirit preserves us now.

Finally, there is a sense of organic unity. Consider that we have Elspeth (reformed) and Alte (traditional catholic) as editrixes of that blog in a Lenten break, and Svar (Catholic) and Will S (quite reformed) agree on most things.  Unity from the top has not worked… but the laity are awakening, and will stand together.

Finally, we need to recall our Kipling and Ezekiel. We may be preserved by God, but we need to stand and do our duty. We were not promised ease. We were promised instead great blessings — together with great challenges, great difficulties. We cannot walk away from  our duty.

Us Reformed are cross grained and difficult. It is our job to apply the rule and plumb line, to be theological Sons of Martha, but to still be talking with and working with each other.