IThe black line is a corrected version of the standard tree data set. The set is now open. The tree cores were selected. Data points were left out. The data was reconstructed and further data added. That is the black line. There is no evidence of a temperature change. GCS may be false. and peer review did not pick it.
Dark Brightness
Bleak theology: hopeful science.
I am definitely bookmarking this page and sharing it with my friends.
Did you really expect peer review to pick this? When you are reviewing a paper you do NOT have access to the data. You have to take the figures on faith. Most of the time you are reviewing because you are seen as an expert in that field.
This means (paraphrasing Kuhn) you know the narrative and the state of play in this area and you will not question expected or hoped for results.
Which is what this data was fudged to be: it is the climatologists equivalent of the Piltdown man.