The ancient use of amenable authority.

The gospel is hated. No news there: it has always been hated. And the techniques that are used against the gospel are the same used by social justice warriors at any time. To Precis Social Justice Always Lie.

  1. Point and shriek The gospel is horrifying. It is hate speech. It offends our identity as Transunicorns. Those who speak as such must be silenced. There must be apologize
  2. Demand Confession The apology is a confession of guilt. It means that the media pressure shall intensify, and the organization or person can be accounted as a undermeschen, beneath consideration.
  3. Appeal to amenable authority. The key word here is amenable. You find the one judge who is biased against the gospel, or ensure that the laws are changed so that any preaching of the gospel is illegal. There is a reason that it took the cuckservative muppets of the liberal party to pass MH 103.
  4. Proclaim victory. It shall be noted in wikipedia, the Times of India, and the New York Times. Whenever the gospel is mentioned, it shall be referenced
  5. Ignore the harm to your people. Without the people of Christ, you love evil, and that makes your nation stupid. The good we people of Christ do is not happening. The nuts are not tightened: the roads not maintained, and you blame colonialism for a lack of maintenance. Or the endemic inequality and tyranny that you now suffer under

This is the modus operandi of the social justice wankers. It is copied from the Hindu, who used these tactics against the British Empire, who would have ensured that a Christian orphanage remained open.

From the perspective of the Indian government, Compassion International is improperly registered as an aid organization because of its religious activities. Two nongovernmental organizations supported by Compassion International—the Chennai-based Caruna Bal Vikas Trust and Compassion East India—both participate in religious activity without being registered as religious organizations.

The government also pointed to evidence of conversions by organizations supported by Compassion International, and its mission statement—which lists turning children into responsible Christian adults as a priority—to argue that it is a religious organization.

For these reasons, the Indian government decided to keep the restrictions in place even after a meeting with Compassion International and U.S. representatives. The Indian government told the U.S. representatives that Compassion International or the organizations it works with should re-register as religious organizations, based on their activities.

But Compassion International has not pursued this step based on advice from its legal team that it would lead to further paralysis. Compassion International’s general counsel said the Indian suggestion was legally impossible and disingenuous.

While religious liberty is codified in Article 15 of the Indian Constitution, and is an important right in a multicultural and multireligious society, it has recently come under pressure in India due to a rise in Hindu nationalism.

Our Brother the Knight of Winter has intimate knowledge of this, and he comments.

I come from a partially Hindu background, and I have to work with a lot of Indian people in my current job as a software engineer. And I have indeed noticed an aversion to Christianity from them. it’s actually very strange. When I ask them about religion, they can talk passionately about religious diversity and how tolerant their Hinduism is. But if you dig a little more under the surface, not only do they disagree with everything I believe, but they also don’t think I should allowed to express my views in public to anyone who doesn’t already agree with me.

So why is that? Well, although many East Indian people that I speak to know a great deal about computer science and making money, they actually know almost nothing about religions other than their own. For them, religion isn’t an area for investigation about what’s true or false. For them, religion is like their nationality or race or family or community. It’s beyond logic and evidence, it’s just design for social cohesion. So, if, for example, you tell a Hindu that their oscillating eternal cosmology is factually false, they get angry because that’s not religion is for them. They don’t care whether what they believe is true or false, so long as it helps them get along with their families and communities. And since Christianity would cause a break up in their families and communities (should anyone convert), they want to stop all logical and evidential discussions of it.

The gospel is not about social inclusion. Christ noted that the gospel would divide families: father from son, brother from sister, wife from husband. For you either disavow the evil within yourself, and try to work in the light, and, like Paul, calling yourself the greatest of sinners or you celebrate your spirituality and measure your self esteem.

You either worship God, who became incarnate and died for the sake of a fallen humanity, or you lie to yourself, and think humans have the godhead. And all will be sacrified for social inclusion. You cannot do both.

And, as the narrative of this time becomes more divorced from reality, speaking truth will be hate speech. This is the ancient tactics of the Hindu, learned from the father of lies. Shun it.

One thought on “The ancient use of amenable authority.

Leave a Reply