I got diverted this morning. I looked at the Herald to see what was happening is that the Social Justice Warriors are following the script. They have decided that the Maori Pentecostals can be under the bus. They have been told that their client immigrants must also be damned.

Because the offended will distort and lie: they say Tamaki said but one thing. They project their own sense of guilt and shame. They clutch their pearls, faint, and appeal to an authority, so the process of investigation will be the punishment.

The Human Rights Commission has received 16 complaints about Brian Tamaki’s rant blaming gay people for earthquakes.
In a sermon the day before last week’s massive 7.8 magnitude earthquake which killed two people, Tamaki told churchgoers quakes were a result of sexual perversions.

He also blamed a gay priest and the people of Christchurch for the devastating earthquakes that hit Canterbury in 2010 and 2011, killing 185 people.

A spokeswoman for the commission said 16 complaints had been received about his speech, which could result in mediation.

After the rant was reported by the Herald, Human Rights Commissioner Richard Tankersley branded it as “disgusting.”

“Tamaki’s words are a lesson to us all that intolerance and prejudice is very real,” Tankersley said.

“At this time when families are mourning loved ones and many more are scared and wondering how to face the next day, this kind of message is frankly, disgusting.”

Tamaki’s comments were labelled “ridiculous” by Prime Minister John Key, while the mayor of Kaikoura Winston Gray called them “pathetic”.

And the sermon also prompted an online campaign asking people to donate to Rainbow Youth using Brian Tamaki’s name. More than $3000 had been given by the end of last week.

Meanwhile, the commission has also received 17 complaints about Muslim cleric Shaykh Dr Mohammad Anwar Sahib.

The top cleric, who was also the secretary of the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand until today, was shown in a series of lectures recorded at a Manukau mosque and posted on social media vilifying Jewish and Christian communities.

They do this in the knowledge that the authorities are converged, and that the verdict is known. The only court they want is a kangaroo court. If the outcome is in question, it is deemed unfair.

Feminists astutely recognize that conservatives have given them carte blanche to destroy families, so long as the feminists pretend they are only destroying marriages for the most serious reasons. As a result, we have answered both the question of how to replace marriage (with child support and other cash and prizes) as well as how many marriages should be replaced (as many as women desire). This has been codified into law, and perfectly describes our family courts. Women who want to divorce know they are assured of receiving custody, and custody determines who gets (vs pays) the cash and prizes.

Since there is by design no attempt in our system to determine if the man being punished actually deserves to be punished, the only conservative defense of this system is a claim that no sane woman would do this unless pushed to the limits by a truly bad man. Although the system is designed to provide a strong incentive for wives to eject husbands from the family, conservatives vehemently argue that following this route creates so much hardship for a wife that no formal protections against abusing the system are required.

But feminists long ago were able to craft this new legal model with the full support of conservatives. Feminists have also been largely successful at removing the social stigma against wives who destroy their families, with the great help of conservatives (especially Christian conservatives). Now that the new regime is in place and supported by nearly everyone, the need for divorcing mothers to keep up the facade that conservatives rely on is fading away. Now women who discard the father of their children have less incentive to pretend that they did anything but make the obvious cost/benefit calculation our family model invites them to make. Is it easier to stay married and raise children with less than 100% autonomy, or is it easier to eject the father from the home while retaining the bulk of his spendable earnings

However, this will not continue. This virtue spiral will, like all such, end. We were not placed in our nations to destroy them. The anti discrimination ideas are a lie. We used to stand against them A New blog, Northern Dawn, has an agenda I approve of: we rediscover that we were part of a British Empire, where Cathedral and Crown did work together for good.

There is a deeper meaning to the name of Northern Dawn. In the furthest reaches of the north, the sun does not set for months out of the year. This is reflected in myths throughout various cultures of a land where the sun never sets. What dawns from the north is this undying light.

Canada is a dominion of the north and was founded as the home of an ancient light. Against the liberal republic to her south – and the chaotic oligarchy and atomistic individualism it represented – the Loyalist foundations of Canada began to take shape. Canada represented a different vision of what ethos should shape the North American continent. This ethos was forged and embodied in the Crown: order and hierarchy, sovereign authority, freedom under law, and Canada’s continuity with her ancestral faith, spirit, and civilization. A stark contrast to the reign of quantity over quality, divisive factionalism, tyrannical chaos, and cultural amnesia which global liberalism has created.

The project of Northern Dawn is simple. If global liberalism – and its errors and crises – are to be overcome, it will only be because an alternative exists which makes itself worthy to succeed it. A man must become worthy of a family and household, and a civilization must become worthy of order and glory – and the only difference is scale. The tradition exists. The wisdom exists. What is needed are people dedicated to receiving and living it. Northern Dawn aims to accomplish this through intellectual work, social connections, aesthetics and discipline.

While Northern Dawn is a Canadian project, it cannot be emphasised enough that Canada does not stand alone. We are part of the North American continent, we are part of the Anglosphere, and we inherit the traditions of Western civilisation and Imperial Christendom. In upholding the Royalist faith of Canada, Northern Dawn seeks to pave the way for a Restoration which ends the downward course our civilizations has placed itself on, and begins a new cycle upward – perhaps even into the stars.

I would rather, though I have nonconformist blood in my veins, have a bishop priest with the royal seal behind him than fear a political commissioner. The Twentieth century had nothing but poisonous ideologies the converged demand we agree with in totality.

Let us not. Let us seek something better, and not appeal to those very authorities that are biased against the true, the just, the good and the righteous.