One of the bands that existed when I was a kid, and played in a now demolished pub (the Gluepot, of Ponsony) had a hit that is covered here. No, it is not written in England though it is about Liverpool: Graham Brazier, who was a first-generation New Zealander, died this month. Another one of the late boomers that formed my youth who did not make it to his Gold Card.

As these people shuffle off the stage (there is something peculiarly sad about the aging rocker. Which is why so many of now play in community orchestras: you cannot pretend to be a young guitar hero with middle-aged spread), the memes they have had are failing, and will die.

For they have pushed. They have projected. They have doubled down. And it does not work

In Babylon’s holy institution of social justice, evil was symbolized by Tiamat, the goddess of motherhood and beauty. Just as feminists despise the motherhood role of women today, they concocted this character Tiamat, as “a mother who put her children’s well-being before her own.”

Tiamat was brutally killed by a shining hero named Marduk. Marduk did away with the old conservative ways and issued in progressivism. He altered the natural universe into a new order, and enslaved Tiamat’s followers, which symbolized mankind. He then took a partner named Sarpanit, synonymous with Ishtar, the goddess of sex and prostitution.

In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the divine princess Ishtar gets her daddy to take revenge on Gilgamesh for refusing her sexual advances, and he ends up losing eternal life. Babylon was a feminist dream.

It is not by coincidence that Hebrew and Christian theology is a polar opposite of this myth. In their theology, motherhood and family is not evil, but is celebrated. The “woman in the wilderness” is taken care of by God and symbolizes the church. Marduk is not the hero, but is the villain Lucifer, whose plan to enslave mankind fails.

Study carefully the devil in the bible and you will find an oppressive dictator who seeks universal equality. The Hebrew religion subverted the progressivism in Babylon with its own theology of personal liberty and responsibility.

Ezekiel spoke harshly against those who supported Babylon. “And the Babylonians came to her into the bed of love, and they defiled her with their whoredom, and she was polluted with them.” (Ezek 23:17) He compared these supporters to sexually addicted young whores, and upbraided young women who traveled to Babylon to be part of the flashy new culture. These apostates denied the patriarchal authority of the prophets, and they sought a code of social justice that focused on the worldly.

The cure for this is revival. But revival comes with preconditions. It requires that the Church has a faithful remnant that prays for revival. It needs some health in society. And it needs a sense of shame and sin within: what Babylon lacked, above all, was a conscience.

They considered slavery, the use of others as objects, for labour, decoration and sexual satisfaction, as perfectly reasonable. Because the were the elite of the state. Such societies can last for a while, but when they crumble, they disappear. A bit like the Soviets, who are only recalled with favour by those who never lived in such a society.

Far better that we rediscover masculinity and feminity and build health into society, while the progressivist call us vile Patriarchs. They will fade. Christ will not.

I’ve written on the long march before and how the progressivists goal is to have us dependent on the state, how the alt-right, manosphere, and their issues are all related and at war with progressive unreality, and how we can fight the progressivists, or at least protect a remnant to rebuild when state-backed unreality is no longer sustainable.

The goal of the long march is to get us dependent on the state. The most effective way to do this is by destroying the community ties that bind us and create civil society. These voluntary, local ties to the individuals around us allow us to live free and independent from the state.

The strongest of these social ties are marriage and the nuclear family, so these are the ones attacked the most by the anti-civilization forces.

One tool in destroying the family is destroying male-female relationships, so that they never join together to become families in the first place. So, you end up with men writing things like this. Through feminism making modern marriage inhospitable to modern man, man stops caring about and for women and preemptively removes himself from the family.

But feminism is not the end goal of the state-worshippers, it is but one step in the process. The next step is the adoption of Men’s Rights and/or MGTOW.

…a destructive marriage ending in divorce is worse for society than no marriage at all. Find a good wife if you can.

In fact, I’m not telling you not to be a PUA, an MRA, or a MGTOW. You are free man, do what you want. Besides, there are probably not enough good wives out there for every man, so many will have to find an alternative.

All I want, is for you to think about it. To know that by fighting progressivism with more progressivism or by simply stopping caring, you are not helping the problem and are probably hurting yourself in the long run.

If you decide trying to fight the system is too much of a pain and want to be a MGTOW, I won’t condemn you, in fact I sympathize. If you decide that fucking sluts is too much fun, that is your perogative, but will you think the same a decade from now when every pussy feels the same and the mechanical sex is little better than emotionlessly masturbating into a very realistic sex doll?

Make an informed choice that is all.

Then again, maybe the system is doomed, and the PUA’s, MRA’s and MGTOW’s are simply hastening its inevitable collapse and hopeful rebirth. In which case, maybe they are doing civilization a service.

Our civilization is being invaded. We are not making enough babies to keep our population up. Our churches are desecrated, and the young are taught to despise the treasures within their civilization. We cannot keep this up. It will stop, and stop fast.

As men, our first duty is to protect our children and wives, and then those of our neighbourhood, city and nation. The woman without protection will need the same — not because society is getting better, but because if it falls, it will be far, far worse.

A coward can walk away. The remainder of us better reform and do our duty.