The quisling chronicles.

Posted on By pukeko

Feminism has many faults, but generally the women get a pass, even when they do not deserve one. But the collaborators, those men who aligh with the oppressors, well, even the women are disgusted.

Thanks for calling out the collaborating, boot-licking, supplicating, lying mangina traitors to their own because you are correct that they aid in the further injustices committed against men, the women who care about them and not to mention their children. Futrelle has long railed against the “misogyny” of men’s rights advocates and men in general, but what should really boil the blood of all people of goodwill is his labeling of men who want a big part of raising their children the “abusers lobby” even though women and children are statistically safest with the husband and biological father present in the home. Most of the child abuse statistics which include molestation, rape, and murder (and I believe them to be growing as the family unit disintegrates further) come from single mother’s sex partners and the revolving door of boyfriends who want to bang the mother but want nothing to do with her children.

In other words, a brony is a wretched, immature male who engages purposefully in behavior and entertainment that should have been left behind when he transitioned from childhood to manhood. His devotion to a children’s television show calls into question his ability to function as an adult and to adopt and maintain adult responsibilities. All adults are, wisely, suspicious of age-contemporaries who exhibit inordinately immature personality traits. If you work in an office where the shirt and tie are the norm, you don’t give big projects or bigger responsibilities to the guy in the pink “Friendship is Magic” t-shirt. If you are looking for an adult to babysit your children, you do not select someone your children consider a playmate, who shares their interests and dresses as they do. If you are a woman selecting a mate, you do not choose a “man” who behaves and comports himself as an overgrown child, an immature man-baby exulting in entertainments appropriate to preteens and tweens.

The trouble with supplication is that it leads to contempt. SSM found this tweet, which shows this: look at the arrogance of the woman. The man is facing a choice between living comfortably and respectably in a sexless marriage, or in poverty and disgrace, unable to provide (after alimony) for a wife. Celibacy is his fate.

In more healthy times men were told to lead. to motivate, to inspire. Not to supplicate. To provide, not to require support. And there are many sites that help here. A good place to start is simply walking if you can and joining a gym.

But being a man is more than being fit, dressing well, and being able to put food on the table. It involves the ability to look outside your own needs and care for others: to teach, to mentor, to mould others, sacrificing time and resources for others. Classically, this is what a father did for his children. It is what a good leader does for his service: you know you have succeeded when you have trained your successor and can step aside and let him lead.

It’s not about qualifications; it is not about being perfect. It’s flawed. It’s messy. And if you do any of this, you will limit your life. You will give up freedoms. You will make mistakes. But you will not betray your oath.

You will be faithful. You will not betray your blood and your neighbour to the enemy. And you will not be deceived by false goals.

2 thoughts on “The quisling chronicles.”

  1. Love the picture of the young ladies showing that rock does indeed beat paper–so did Mrs. Bubba. But don’t those young ladies look, shall we say, a little bit weathered for college students? It makes me wonder…….

    And regarding the Chicago picture, I’d have real compassion on the guy if I didn’t know how he got to divorce court. In 1948, it was adultery or abandonment. Plus, he’s not likely to be poor–there were no 30 year mortgages at the time, so judging by his wife’s mink, even the “divide by two with alimony” treatment is going to leave him pretty well off.

    Unless of course his employer had a morals clause, in which case he’s screwed whether or not she takes him back. But not screwed.

Comments are closed.