Dark Brightness

Bleak Theology: Hopeful Science

Contra Liberalism.

In case people are wondering, there was no post yesterday. I was on the road at 7 am to get to Winnipeg for an 0930 flight to Vancouver. I intended to use the laptop to make a post there. However, the public wi-fi was flakey. To the point of un-usability.

And Thursday, to me, disappeared at the International date line.

This morning I read this in the Orthosphere.

Liberalism’s basic appeal is freedom: For nonwhites, freedom from oppression by whites. For women, freedom from oppression by men. For all people, freedom from traditional morality, religion, authority, material want, and so on.

It’s the same satanic appeal the Serpent made to Eve in the Garden of Eden: “Did God really say…?” (that is, the traditional authorities are not to be trusted) and “You shall be like God,” (that is, you can live on your own terms.)

And most non-conservatives think that the basic conservative message is “You must obey our rules!”  Compared with the liberal message of “You can be your own god!,” conservatism doesn’t look good at first glance.

The problem is that the fruits of liberalism are not freedom but oppression. The current US government is… quite liberal. These men have ridden roughshod over the laws of a sovereign ally (and been called on it in the High Court), deliberately armed gangs fighting the legitimate police forces of a neighbouring nation (Ann Coulter calls this the biggest scandal in US history. She’s wrong: that was Dredd Scott.), and have just forced through mandated health care — as a new tax, which will hit every parent who has to now pay child support well after their kid turns 18.

In short, this liberal government functions like the fascists they oppose. The fruits of liberalism is soft fascism: not freedom but slavery.

Now, slavery makes one dependant.  Which brings us to another passage from Numbers

Numbers 20:1-13

1The Israelites, the whole congregation, came into the wilderness of Zin in the first month, and the people stayed in Kadesh. Miriam died there, and was buried there.

2Now there was no water for the congregation; so they gathered together against Moses and against Aaron. 3The people quarreled with Moses and said, “Would that we had died when our kindred died before the LORD! 4Why have you brought the assembly of the LORD into this wilderness for us and our livestock to die here? 5Why have you brought us up out of Egypt, to bring us to this wretched place? It is no place for grain, or figs, or vines, or pomegranates; and there is no water to drink.” 6Then Moses and Aaron went away from the assembly to the entrance of the tent of meeting; they fell on their faces, and the glory of the LORD appeared to them. 7The LORD spoke to Moses, saying: 8Take the staff, and assemble the congregation, you and your brother Aaron, and command the rock before their eyes to yield its water. Thus you shall bring water out of the rock for them; thus you shall provide drink for the congregation and their livestock.

9So Moses took the staff from before the LORD, as he had commanded him. 10Moses and Aaron gathered the assembly together before the rock, and he said to them, “Listen, you rebels, shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” 11Then Moses lifted up his hand and struck the rock twice with his staff; water came out abundantly, and the congregation and their livestock drank. 12But the LORD said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not trust in me, to show my holiness before the eyes of the Israelites, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them.” 13These are the waters of Meribah, where the people of Israel quarreled with the LORD, and by which he showed his holiness.

Now, God does not play favourites. Miriam had challenged Moses, and was corrected: she now dies. Moses did not speak to the rock — he hit it. Now why Moses was damned remains difficult Calvin here speaks wisely

There is no doubt but that Moses was perplexed between hope and doubt, so that, although he committed the event to God, he was still to a certain extent oppressed with anxiety; for he would never have been so ready and prompt in obeying, and especially in such an unusually arduous matter, if he had been without faith. Aaron and himself had recently hidden themselves in alarm; it was, therefore, a task of no slight difficulty straightway to call the people, from whom they had fled, and voluntarily to encounter their madness. Thus far, then, we see nothing but a readiness to obey, conjoined with magnanimity, which is deserving of no common praise; but inasmuch as the unbelief of Moses is condemned by the heavenly Judge, in whose hands is the sovereign power, and at whose word we all stand or fall, we must acquiesce in His sentence. We scarcely perceive anything reprehensible in this matter, yet, since God declares that the fall of Moses displeased Him, we must abide by His decision rather than our own. And hence, too, let us learn that our works, on the surface of which nothing but virtue is apparent, are often abounding in secret defects, which escape the eyes of men, but are manifest to God alone.

If it be asked in what respect Moses transgressed, the origin of his transgression was unbelief; for it is not allowable, when this species of sin is expressly referred to in the answer of God, to imagine that it was anything else. But it is doubtful in what point he was incredulous; unless it be, that in asking whether he could fetch water out of the rock, he seems to reject as if it were impossible and absurd what God had promised to do. And, in fact, he was so entirely taken up by considerations of their contumacy, that he did not acknowledge the grace of God. He inquires whether he shall fetch water out of the rock? whereas he ought to have recollected that this had already been permitted to him by God. It became him, then, confidently to assert that God had again promised the same thing, rather than to speak with hesitation.

Others think that he sinned, because he was not contented with a single blow, but smote the rock twice. And this perhaps did arise from distrust. But the origin of the fault was that he did not simply embrace God’s promise, and strenuously discharge the duty assigned to him as an evidence of his faith. Although, therefore, his smiting the rock twice might have been a token of his want of confidence, still it was only an aggravation of the evil, and not its origin or cause. Thus, then, we must always come back to this, that Moses did not give God the glory, because he rather considered what the people had deserved, than estimated the power of God according to His word. And this, too, has previous reprimand denotes, when, in accusing the Israelites of rebellion, he shows, indeed, that he was inflamed with holy zeal; yet, at the same time, he does not bestir himself with suitable confidence in order to their conviction; nay, in a manner he confesses that the power of God fails beneath their wickedness. Thus it is said in Ps. 106:32, 33,

“That it went in with Moses for their sakes, because they provoked his spirit, so that he spoke with his mouth:”  109

for the Prophet does not there excuse Moses; but shows that in consequence of the wickedness of the people, he was carried away by inconsiderate fervor, so as to deny that what God had promised should take place. Hence let us learn that, when we are angered by the sins of others, we should beware lest a temptation of an opposite kind should take possession of our minds.

It may be that, as others have suggested, that the rock was known to have a spring under it — and Moses knew how to get at it. That striking the rock was usual. In that case, however, some other person should have done it.

Slaves moan.  As Calvin pointed out, this provoked Moses to Anger and in this he could not glorify God.

And here liberalism falls down. For it also cannot glorify God. Nor man. Nor anything… for any sense of the miraculous, the altruistic, from the most noble to simple human decency must be subverted to fit within their ideology. They may have the form of religion, but the power, the power of salvation, is missing.

As they cannot acknowledge God, they destroy all that is good and just… to the point where people rebel because not only are they poor and oppressed, but the simple comforts of family, of beauty, and of truth have been taken from them.  They make us dependent: then they demand courage and sacrifice from those they have trained to be cowards with a sense of entitlement.

But there is hope. During this time, a new generation rose in Israel, that under the command of Joshua destroyed the ritual (child sacrifice and temple prostitution of the Canaanites. The pendulum will turn. The current iteration of liberalism (social democrat or socialist politics) will be on the ash heap. I hope, however, that this does not require the destruction of nations and Peoples — for if we continue down the path, we are on, our society will die.


2 thoughts on "Contra Liberalism."

  • Adam says:

    I spoke to my wife about this same Bible event, yesterday. Imagine my surprise that I found you to have published the answer to my question, the very next morning.

    When I spoke to my wife, my heart was heavy with grief over the Obamacare supreme court ruling. I prayed for an answer to my grief, and I was reminded of this same story.

    God commanded Moses to strike the Nile river for the plague of blood. God commanded Moses to strike a rock in years prior to this sinful scene, and that water was good. In the event described, God is asking Moses to go without his staff.

    The other thing I was given yesterday: Christ is the rock.

    • chrisgale says:

      I’m not from the USA.
      But… yesterday, my father (who is very anti technology, and hates hackers) said that Dotcom had been done over and the US was illegal. He did his compulsory military service between NZ troops fighting in Korea and Vietnam, (we had people in the front line in both).
      Obama and his goons are disgusting the world. There is an election in November. There are things you can do about it…

      And Christ is our rock.


Comments are closed.