<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dark Brightness &#187; Shame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/tag/shame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog</link>
	<description>Bleak theology: hopeful science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Concentrate in the important.</title>
		<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/06/concentrate-in-the-important/</link>
		<comments>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/06/concentrate-in-the-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pukeko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[evidence and policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamaborg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times has an interesting set of comments. In New Zealand, we have, until recently, kept private things private. For we are fully aware that our politicians are not saints. But things changed&#8230; slowly. Having the PM and Leader of &#8230; <a href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/06/concentrate-in-the-important/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times has an interesting set of comments. In New Zealand, we have, until recently, kept private things private. For we are fully aware that our politicians are not saints. But things changed&#8230; slowly. Having the PM and Leader of the Opposition have to play happy families &#8212; Paul Holmes visiting &#8212; has not helped. It affects the children. There have been suicides.</p>
<p>But&#8230; there are standards. I support <a href="http://gotcha.co.nz">the Whale</a> in exposing rorts of credit cards for private meals, flowers, underpants and other things.</p>
<p>Like McCrystal, I have been at times scathing about my employers. I have had confrontations with the suits. I have advocated for staff. <strong>That is part of my job.</strong> However, if a reporter was present&#8230; I would turn into a jargon spouting eunuch. It&#8217;s called survival.</p>
<blockquote><p>Then, after Vietnam, an ethos of exposure swept the culture. The assumption among many journalists was that the establishment may seem upstanding, but there is a secret corruption deep down. It became the task of journalism to expose the underbelly of public life, to hunt for impurity, assuming that the dark hidden lives of public officials were more important than the official performances&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>In other words, over the course of 50 years, what had once been considered the least important part of government became the most important</strong>. These days, the inner soap opera is the most discussed and the most fraught arena of political life.</p>
<p>And into this world walks Gen. Stanley McChrystal.</p>
<p>General McChrystal was excellent at his job. He had outstanding relations with the White House and entirely proper relationships with his various civilian partners in the State Department and beyond. He set up a superb decision-making apparatus that deftly used military and civilian expertise.</p>
<p>But McChrystal, like everyone else, kvetched. And having apparently missed the last 50 years of cultural history, he did so on the record, in front of a reporter. And this reporter, being a product of the culture of exposure, made the kvetching the center of his magazine profile.</p>
<p>By putting the kvetching in the magazine, the reporter essentially took run-of-the-mill complaining and turned it into a direct challenge to presidential authority. He took a successful general and made it impossible for President Obama to retain him.The reticent ethos had its flaws. <strong>But the exposure ethos, with its relentless emphasis on destroying privacy and exposing impurities, has chased good people from public life, undermined public faith in institutions and elevated the trivial over the important.</strong></p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/opinion/25brooks.html">Op-Ed Columnist &#8211; General McChrystal and the Culture of Exposure &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>It may be that McCrystal has more honour that I, or any other Kiwi, has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/06/concentrate-in-the-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shame, anger, Galifornia.</title>
		<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/</link>
		<comments>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pukeko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that some radicals have invaded churches, because california passed proposition 8, which amends the California state constitution so that a marriage is defined as between a man and a woman. WorldNet reports: Decisions by voters in Florida, Arizona &#8230; <a href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that some radicals have invaded churches, because california passed proposition 8, which amends the California state constitution so that a marriage is defined as between a man and a woman.</p>
<p><a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=80220">WorldNet reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Decisions by voters in Florida, Arizona and California to join residents of 27 other states with constitutional protections for traditional marriage<br />
have prompted threats of violence against Christians and their churches.</p>
<p>&#8220;Burn their f&#8212;ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers,&#8221; wrote &#8220;World O Jeff&#8221; on the JoeMyGod blogspot today within hours of California officials declaring Proposition 8 had been approved by a margin of 52 percent to 48 percent. Confirmation on voter approval of amendments in Florida and Arizona came earlier.</p>
<p>The amendments in all three states essentially limit marriage to one man and one woman. In California, the measure states the only marriages &#8220;valid and recognized&#8221; in the state are those between one man and one woman.</p>
<p>Thirty states now have adopted marriage amendments. However, in California, the vitriol appeared especially high since the state Supreme Court in May created same-sex marriage for homosexuals. Proposition 8 overruled the court decision, readopting the marriage definition California votersadopted in 2000.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now the logic is that this is lobbying, which cannot be done by charities, which is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anathem">bullshyt</a>. Reformed churhc es attempt to influence the secular government: this is the reason for a&#8221; public questions committee&#8221;. From <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mario-ruiz/gays-hit-back-at-mormons_b_142001.html">Huffington</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Some pro-Proposition 8 folks may come to regret their not so private support of hate. And were you thinking about skiing in Utah this year? Hmmm, Colorado&#8217;s looking pretty appealing these days.</p>
<p>Yet somehow an economic boycott doesn&#8217;t feel direct enough; those who team up against gay people must learn that there are consequences.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we are seeking to strip the Mormon church of its status as a religious organization. According to IRS law, &#8220;no organization, including a church, may qualify for IRC section 501(c)(3) status if a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation (commonly known as lobbying).&#8221; [Emphasis added.]</p>
<p>Please join our efforts and show the world that gay people &#8212; and their friends and families &#8212; know how to hit back</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m no Mormon. But they first came for the Mormons&#8230;<br />
Now when the Church stands up <strong>as it should</strong> and says to our Muslim friends &#8220;<em>&#8220;Brother, do not kill your son because he loves a boy. Pray for him, love him&#8221;</em, when the church stands for the poor, the left applaud. When the church stands up and states a carefully worked out ethic that people disapprove of, argue back...</p>
<p>From today's<a href="http://www.pcusa.org/cgi-bin/lectiond.cgi"> lectionary</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>For     many live as enemies of the cross of Christ; I have often told you of them,     and now I tell you even with tears. <sup><small>19</small></sup>Their end     is destruction; their god is the belly; and their glory is in their shame;     their minds are set on earthly things</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>I find I struggle with the attraction of the Belly &#8212;  and there is a whole industry that sets my mind on earthly things. What the radicals do is glory in their shame. Maywe be ashamed ot that which is shameful, as this is the first step to repentence.</p>
<p>Hat tip <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/11/07/unhinged-losers-prop-8-opponents-threaten-mormons-and-catholics/">Michell Malkin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
