<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dark Brightness &#187; Rainbow activism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/tag/rainbow-activism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog</link>
	<description>Bleak theology: hopeful science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:29:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Let us speak truth to power.</title>
		<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/10/let-us-speak-truth-to-power/</link>
		<comments>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/10/let-us-speak-truth-to-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pukeko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daybook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poltroons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/?p=920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When laws become long and cumbersone, we are colluding with specail interests. This is interesting, because we either have free political speech or we do not. If we have blasphemy rules, (which is what stating one can call a group &#8230; <a href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/10/let-us-speak-truth-to-power/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/10/let-us-speak-truth-to-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three dangers, no four</title>
		<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/04/three-dangers-no-four/</link>
		<comments>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/04/three-dangers-no-four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pukeko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daybook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green lunancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lectionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plenary indulgences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are three or four dangers here. The danger of listening to reason and ignoring the suppositions behind it. It one supposes there is no need to invoke the deity &#8212; G_d is not on the playing field &#8212; the &#8230; <a href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/04/three-dangers-no-four/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2010/04/three-dangers-no-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shame, anger, Galifornia.</title>
		<link>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/</link>
		<comments>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pukeko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that some radicals have invaded churches, because california passed proposition 8, which amends the California state constitution so that a marriage is defined as between a man and a woman. WorldNet reports: Decisions by voters in Florida, Arizona &#8230; <a href="http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pukeko.net.nz/blog/2008/11/shame-anger-galifornia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

