Repitition is useful.

There is no new part of the gospel: there are no myths. There is nothing clever. Peter is repeating what has already been taught.

Peter sees his death coming, and like Moses long sermon (Deuteronomy), he is reminding people of what they already know.

2 Peter 1:12-18

12 Therefore I intend to keep on reminding you of these things, though you know them already and are established in the truth that has come to you. 13 I think it right, as long as I am in this body, to refresh your memory, 14 since I know that my death will come soon, as indeed our Lord Jesus Christ has made clear to me. 15 And I will make every effort so that after my departure you may be able at any time to recall these things.

16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we had been eyewitnesses of his majesty. 17 For he received honor and glory from God the Father when that voice was conveyed to him by the Majestic Glory, saying, “This is my Son, my Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.” 18 We ourselves heard this voice come from heaven, while we were with him on the holy mountain.

The interesting thing is that Peter had to say this. This implies that already:

  • There were people saying it was a myth. That Jesus had not risen, the disciples had stolen the body and buried it (see Acts).
  • That the message of Jesus was spiritual and did not have any earthly meaning — that what we do here does not matter, and the body does not matter. This led to the gnostic error.
  • That there is  more that Jesus provided. That there is a deeper meaning — again a gnostic error — or a deeper teaching (from the Law of Moses, or some syncretic movement. There is but what Jesus provided from through the Holy Spirit.

Peter needs to repeat this. We need to have it repeated. For the error of this age is to ignore our evil and, like the Cathars, pretend we are perfect, and (again, like the Cathars) complain and even riot when we are reminded of our imperfections. Christ was offensive.

Matthew 21:12-14

12Then Jesus entered the temple and drove out all who were selling and buying in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who sold doves. 13He said to them, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer’; but you are making it a den of robbers.”

14The blind and the lame came to him in the temple, and he cured them.

We need to be reminded that Jesus was not afraid to remove those who exploited — particularly from the temple — and to help those in need. One of the reformed mottos is semper reformans — always reforming. We need to continually be measuring ourselves against the standard set by Jesus, and the apostles. As a church, we need to be continually reminding oursleves that our speculation is of limited value.

But the Gospel has the power to save. There is no other. And that needs repetition — for those who are lost to hear, and for those who know it not to stray into error.

Is the human duty to care for legislation?

Last night I watched an election where the centre-right party won, but the very things that will ensure it remains in power — reform of the voting system and powerful coalition parties — failed. I can recall a time three elections ago when the same thing happened to the left: their reliable coalition partner (The Alliance) fell apart. The left now have four parties in parliament: the right one and two midgets: ACT and United Future.

This morning I read the blogs and the left is spinning that they are well placed to come back in 2014: the right are down to one monolith and they will get the people to see they are right. In a similar way, the right, who won, are despondent. They have control of the house for three years, but this is the highest ever percentage voted (48% for their party, which would be a landslide under First Past the Post) but don’t have coalition parties.

What I am thinking today is what is our duty, and it comes in two parts. One is to God, and the other to each other.

Amos 2:4-8
4Thus says the LORD: For three transgressions of Judah, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment; because they have rejected the law of the LORD, and have not kept his statutes,
but they have been led astray by the same lies after which their ancestors walked. 5So I will send a fire on Judah, and it shall devour the strongholds of Jerusalem.

Ideologies matter. We must not follow the errors of the past. The last century showed that unbridled capitalism unbalances a society, that a strong middle class stabilizes it (based around marriage and kids, with a living wage for the main earner), and that both fascism and soviet socialism fail as human and economic systems. More recently, we have be led astray by the doctrine of feminism, free love, and easy divorce: we are reaping two to three generations of children who are less stable, less trusting, and less able to form relationships because they have not seen this in the families they grew up in.

6Thus says the LORD: For three transgressions of Israel, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment; because they sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals — 7they who trample the head of the poor into the dust of the earth, and push the afflicted out of the way; father and son go in to the same girl, so that my holy name is profaned; 8they lay themselves down beside every altar on garments taken in pledge; and in the house of their God they drink wine bought with fines they imposed.

In the same manner, we are commanded as people and as a nation not to oppress the poor. The NZ compromise was a form of social safety net (which was originally bought in by Richard Seddon’s liberal party in the 1890s). This has morphed into a centrally run set of rules one requires a postgraduate degree to navigate through.

Individually we should care. We need to support the systems in place in our towns that act as a net: the food banks, the night shelters, the work training… but as individuals we cannot do more.

The state can. But the state is not good at sorting out circumstances. Moreover, the state, in most of the Western World apart from Australia and New Zealand, is bankrupt. You cannot support ten bureaucrats checking on the administration of one person’s dole. We need to simplify, tighten, and make local the means of social welfare.

The big challenge for any government, left or right, is to do this when the tax receipts (from VAT, company tax and income tax, which are the main sources of revenue in NZ for the gov’t( drop because wages deflate, businesses are losing money, and people are not buying.

Perhaps here we do need to look back to the last depression. The use of social banking, social networks (run by unions, friendly societies, churches, the rationalist society…) allow the prudent middle and working class people to have some security for these times. The use of charity — with lower taxes, the social pressure to be generous increases — helped provide for institutions that sheltered the indigent. However, in those days, the unionist worshiped in his chapel the same God and trusted to the same means of salvation that his boss worshipped in his cathedral. There was a shared sense of morality.

And here, Chris Trotter is correct. We have lost this.

The challenge we face, in this time of great difficulty, is to resurrect the human duty to care. For this cannot be legislated, no more than we can force an lion to not eat the lamb put into his cage.

An

We are censored today.

Well, today is the election. This means that any person who blogs in New Zealand is under a set of restrictions. David Farrar summarized them very well as

The Electoral Act states in Paragraph (g) of Section 197(1) that it an offence at any time on polling day (before 7 pm) to publish any statement advising or intended or likely to influence any elector as to the candidate or party for whom the elector should or should not vote, or any statement advising or intended or likely to influence any elector to abstain from voting.

This means I will not be posting any material after midnight that could be seen as influencing any elector as to how to vote, or not to vote. I am asking all those who comment to do the same. The law should be interpreted broadly, so do not post comments tomorrow on any candidate, MP or party, current issues or policy.

I have been no more selective in the reading for today than usual. The PCUSA has four readings most days… Psalms, Old Testament, New Testament, Gospel. It would be redundant to post the entire thing — you can link to it.

But there are two parts to this.

Matthew 20:29-34

29As they were leaving Jericho, a large crowd followed him. 30There were two blind men sitting by the roadside. When they heard that Jesus was passing by, they shouted, “Lord, have mercy on us, Son of David!” 31The crowd sternly ordered them to be quiet; but they shouted even more loudly, “Have mercy on us, Lord, Son of David!” 32Jesus stood still and called them, saying, “What do you want me to do for you?” 33They said to him, “Lord, let our eyes be opened.” 34Moved with compassion, Jesus touched their eyes. Immediately they regained their sight and followed him.

Here Jesus does not do what the crowd want him to do. He ignores the populace. He is undemocratic. There is no election. But there is also no censorship of the cries of help. He heals the blind men…
… and that incident, one of many, is in the Gospels. It is a correction to our five year plans. Things change. One has to make them work… but one must never, never stop paying attention to the needs of others.

1 Peter 4:7-11

7The end of all things is near; therefore be serious and discipline yourselves for the sake of your prayers. 8Above all, maintain constant love for one another, for love covers a multitude of sins. 9Be hospitable to one another without complaining. 10Like good stewards of the manifold grace of God, serve one another with whatever gift each of you has received. 11Whoever speaks must do so as one speaking the very words of God; whoever serves must do so with the strength that God supplies, so that God may be glorified in all things through Jesus Christ.

Peter continues to talk about the fiery trial that is descending on the church (If I recall my Tacitus, Peter was literally correct — Nero burnt Christians, whom he blamed for a large fire in Rome). He talks about how we should behave, being serious, loving each other, placing ourselves in training, and doing everything for the glory of God.

In functional societies, there is no law against choosing to live deliberately, carefully, and with love for one’s brothers and sisters. We do not, yet, have this

The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but that it was impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretence was always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one’s will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic. And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp. Orwell, 1984, Ch.1

I pray this does not happen. And I need to do my duty and vote.

Against the prosperity doctrine.

It is now the last week before my country goes to the elections. The big issue is selling part of the state assets — the ruling party wants to keep a controlling interest in what we call “State owned enterprises” and the socialists want to keep them.

It’s got dirty and ugly, but that is politics. At the same time one of the mainstream media released a report on child poverty. I’m cynical about the timing of this — and comparing NZ, which has a middle income, with Sweden and Japan, which do not.

Today’s reading however confronts us on our greed.

1 Peter 2:1-3

1Rid yourselves, therefore, of all malice, and all guile, insincerity, envy, and all slander. 2Like newborn infants, long for the pure, spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow into salvation — 3if indeed you have tasted that the Lord is good.

Matthew 19:23-30

23Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” 25When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astounded and said, “Then who can be saved?” 26But Jesus looked at them and said, “For mortals it is impossible, but for God all things are possible.”

27Then Peter said in reply, “Look, we have left everything and followed you. What then will we have?” 28Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man is seated on the throne of his glory, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields, for my name’s sake, will receive a hundredfold, and will inherit eternal life. 30But many who are first will be last, and the last will be first.

I do not think that Jesus was saying it is a sin to be rich. The poor will always be with us, as will the rich, There is a limit to how much income redistribution a nation can do without removing the motivation to work.

But there is no moral value in your wealth. It is a tool. Like beauty, intelligence, skill… it is a talent to be used. Sacrificed if needs be.

Coming back to the report about poverty — the issue here is not income as such. it is that the state provided houses are 50 years old — the legacy of the last depression, when the social democratic (Labour) party built then by the bushel — and they are not insulated, nor weatherproof, nor large enough. The rent on them is expensive. Families are sleeping 4 or 5 to a room… and the cold, combined with a low nutrient diet, has led to the recurrence of the diseases in the slums such as rheumatic fever.

People like me live in insulated homes and heat them. Poor people do not: unlike Canada, there is no minimum temperature for houses — and social welfare does not pull children from unhealthy homes.

It is clear that we should help the poor. And there are policies that are in place (that all groups in NZ — from left to right agree with). There is a social safety net.

But we do not count being rich as a sign of blessing. Rather count it as a need to serve others.

The unity of Christ is organic.

Today is, in the Church calendar, the last Sunday of Ordinary Time, known as Christ the King (or Reign of Christ) Sunday. The group I worship with follow the Revised Common Lectionary — which is how I started reading it.

This was not my experience of Reformed Churches before I moved to Dunedin. Most of the time we celebrated Easter and Christmas: knowing that our forefathers really did not want to do this. It was a fear of Papism, of candles, smells, vestments, theatre and fun.

Well, we have candles now. And we still have reformed theology… but we have been influenced by the Anglicans on one side and the Pentecostals of another.

But God does not judge us by these things, but by what we do.

Matthew 25:31-46

31“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. 32All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, 33and he will put the sheep at his right hand and the goats at the left. 34Then the king will say to those at his right hand, ‘Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; 35for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, 36I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.’ 37Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? 38And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? 39And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?’ 40And the king will answer them, ‘Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.’ 41Then he will say to those at his left hand, ‘You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; 42for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’ 44Then they also will answer, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?’ 45Then he will answer them, ‘Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’

Romans 15:5-6

5May the God of steadfastness and encouragement grant you to live in harmony with one another, in accordance with Christ Jesus, 6so that together you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

The Church, in this day, appears broken.

There is no way, in this earth, that you will get a firmly convinced and serious Presbyterian to bend his reformed model of God to accept the practices and prayers of a firmly convinced Catholic. He will grudgingly accept the Anglicans, and will wear earplugs at a Pentecostal service… but there divisions between the models are great.

Yet the same two men (or women) will agree that the committees of both churches come out with statements that subvert the gospel. (I linked to Trad Cath sites yesterday for a reason. The same issues occur in all churches, ranging from Gay men demanding a place by their very existence and the problem of teenage pregnancy to con artists defrauding the Church of funds set aside for the poor).

And both will agree that we need to reach out to those who are mad, who are imprisoned, homeless, hungry… in our family, then in our community, then in the world.

What we are seeing is a functional or organic unity. This crosses the lines of any denomination or sect. The serious about their faith are talking across the boundaries. Because in the end, it is not about the committees, the moderators, the elders, the bishops… it is arbour Christ. We are his Church. He reigns over us. And he will lead his church regardless of who is trying to lead us into error, or away from doing good.

Outside is everyone who practices falsehood

One of the things that I have been thinking about over the last two to three days is how do I advise my boys. Attached to that is how do I advise myself.

For we are all post pubertal, and we are all single. Now the Catholics would be quite firm here, and say that I, as a divorced man, should remain celibate. I would argue, like Calvin, that scripture does not support this tradition… but it does open up a slippery slope. I see friends, members of church, moving in with each other. Falling in love. Unlike son number one (who has not been struck by the arrow of Venus… yet) I miss the wounds of love. The secular “go your own way” meme is not helpful. I am a father: I have sons and daughters. And both are suffering.

Will then challenged me on what I meant by Christianity and Men’s Rights. On reflection, the answer is exactly the same as for feminist Christianity — when you speak and practice falsehood, you are in error.

Revelation 22:14-21

14Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they will have the right to the tree of life and may enter the city by the gates. 15Outside are the dogs and sorcerers and fornicators and murderers and idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices falsehood.

16“It is I, Jesus, who sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.” 17  The Spirit and the bride say, “Come.”  And let everyone who hears say, “Come.” And let everyone who is thirsty come. Let anyone who wishes take the water of life as a gift. 18I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this book; 19if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away that person’s share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. 20The one who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!

Matthew 18:21-22

21Then Peter came and said to him, “Lord, if another member of the church sins against me, how often should I forgive? As many as seven times?” 22Jesus said to him, “Not seven times, but, I tell you, seventy-seven times.

There are two big errors that we commit. The first is that we take it all far to personally. We forget that we are sinners and we will inevitably be in error. The truth that is hidden in the idea that the church is infallible (a rank heresy) is that we cannot see our own errors.
But yesterday the comments here became name calling. Now, I am not blaming BF, Will, Lacey or anyone else. It is human nature and can occur across denominations. We can become condemnatory and legalistic.

Two examples of this error will help. This one is clearly Catholic

The validity of the Protestant Episcopal orders was an object of a serious controversy. Leo XIII solemnly declared that the ordinations of the Anglican confession were invalid, and therefore, the sacraments ministered there are without value. If this is true with regard to the Anglicans, something similar would apply to the other Protestant sects who accept bishops. It is absolutely certain that the declaration of Leo XIII is rigorously applied to the Presbyterian and Anabaptist sects, since they, by not admitting bishops, are “ipso facto” incapable of having valid episcopal ordinations. Thus the baptism that exists among the Episcopalians, of which the Lutherans are a branch, is a motive of very serious doubt. This is why, up until Vatican II, when the Catholic Church received a converted Lutheran, a new conditional Baptism was administered. Hence, there is an element of uncertainty in the Protestant baptism.

Therefore, the common renewal of the vows of Baptism made by Catholics and followers of Luther in Augsburg ignores what was described above and takes as a consummated fact the “validity” of the Protestant baptism. This is equivalent to stating that the prior tradition of the Holy Church has no effect. This act carries a series of grave consequences:

  • it supposes a true apostolic succession among the Lutheran bishops; it supposes the validity of their sacraments;
  • it leads one to accept as valid the “sacraments” of the more radical Protestant sects.

Each of these consequences would be sufficient to declare a person or a movement heretical or suspect of heresy, were the old Code of Canon Law still in place. Incidentally, according to the Code, the simple participation in the same religious ceremony with heretics merited a very rigorous excommunication, an automatic excommunication, without need of any declaration by the authority.

Well, this Presbyterian is quite Calvinist and does not accept apostolic succession. But we can be just as much in error

There is no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ: nor can the Pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that is called God.

 

OK, that is error one.

Error two is more subtle. I mentioned it yesterday, and it is the whispering of falsehood. For men they include “She will take all your money and remove your children. She will divorce you”, or “you will support children that are not yours”, or “you will work your butt into the grave to support her sitting at home eating bon-bons”. For women, it is that “You are a special person, and wonderful, and you deserve the very best man in the world”  (the sex in the city meme) and “He will not understand your need for development and spirituality. You need to find yourself. It will all work out for the best”. (The eat, pray, love meme).

These memes are wrong. When you add the PUA “All women want it, and all women are interchangeable if you know game”. then you have a toxic environment.

Let’s come back to today’s lectionary. Those who practice falsehood will not enjoy the perfection to come in Christ. We are told to come to Christ.

But we are also told to forgive each other. If we know our church history, and how the church has moved, like a drunken sailor, in and out of error and returning to orthodoxy, we can work together without too much disagreement.  If we are honest, we will know that we have hurt people unfairly. The blood of god covers much, God accepts our honest doubts, questions and errors.

He cannot accept us turning reality into a distortion, a lie. For that places us in the centre of creation, damages those among us — and leads to the kind of fragile personalities I see in the emergency room at work. After overdoses and self lacerations..

 

Confrontation is needed, or people get lost.

We have a duty to correct one another. Sometimes this is about trivial things — such as my tendency to play Ani diFranco (who once satirised feminists as “those righteous babes that have their panties on too tight”: my habit of reading the Spectator, and liking (some) Americans.
However, those are trivial. Much more important is confronting the entrenched biases within the church that put women on a pedestal (bad for them) and men in the outhouse (worse, because they leave), water down the gospel, and do not confront when we sin.
Because Jesus does not want any of the flock lost

Matthew 18:10-20

10“Take care that you do not despise one of these little ones; for, I tell you, in heaven their angels continually see the face of my Father in heaven. 12What do you think? If a shepherd has a hundred sheep, and one of them has gone astray, does he not leave the ninety-nine on the mountains and go in search of the one that went astray? 13And if he finds it, truly I tell you, he rejoices over it more than over the ninety-nine that never went astray. 14So it is not the will of your Father in heaven that one of these little ones should be lost.

15“If another member of the church sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If the member listens to you, you have regained that one. 16But if you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. 17If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. 18Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. 19Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. 20For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.”

Now there is a lot in this passage. There is a clear instruction that you do not need a quorum, or a bishop, or a structure to act in this manner. It is the duty of all to correct. What has tended to happen is that it is dumped onto the professionals and hierarchies — to the ridiculous situation where the Pope is blamed for events that happened 20 years ago that he was opposing (as a priest and theologian), frequently in dioceses that were ignoring the teaching of the pope and were functionally not merely protestant but heretical. Or blaming the moderator of the Presbyterian Church for events when it is a post you hold for but one year.

The church in the West is corrupt and flawed. Across many or most branches. Our errors include:

  • A tolerance of divorce and other sexual sin.
  •  We tolerate people,and praise them as successes, who succeed in businesses that harm or damage people. We may shun slavers and pornographers, but accept those that oppress their workers or charge usurious rates of interest.
  • A weakening of the gospel. No one preaches the hard passages. No one talks about hell. Jesus is not seen as a man opening a way for us to reconcile from our inevitable damnation through his death and resurrection but as a good teacher. There is a move to functional unitarianism and reducing Christianity to the level of Buddhism — a good philosophy that increases your happiness rather than the means of salvation.
  • A lack of external witness. The church is always being broken by scandals. We need to be influencing the culture around us by our behaviour (from fidelity and modesty to financial probity) not be shunted to one side because of the bad behaviour of a minority.
  • A move to what C. S. Lewis called “Christianity and”.  Socialist Christians. Feminist Christians. Conservative Christians. Traditionalist Christians. If the ideology is greater than the faith and all the hard sayings in the gospel — indeed the gospel itself — is filtered by the ideology, one is in error. And yes, there is now a Men’s Rights version of this, which can equally be an error.
  • A lack of reading. We have two thousand years of writings from believers who had to work through the difficulties of that day. We have their writings. We can use their writings as a check on our behaviour and work out how to deal with issues because what we face has come before and will come again. This is the reason that I quote from Calvin so much — it is online and he was living in  a self ruling city, facing some of the same issues. It is the reason that the Catholics look at the church fathers so much (Calvin, by the way, does discuss the church fathers extensively. Those who followed him less so.)

We need to regather the means of correction. Men don’t mind their brother doing this. Women have to learn to accept it from women. For none of us are completely pure. We all sin. We all are in error. The spirit is with the Church, true, but the church is not one person. It is people. And these people are commanded to correct each other.

Revival and remnant.

The lectionary continues to move through Ezra and Nehemiah. This is the beginning of a time when the remnant — who had married local women, which was expressly against the Law — listened to the word and made public confession.

The head the law for around three hours and then confessed for about three hours. Then they were commanded to praise the LORD.

Nehemiah 9:1-5

1Now on the twenty-fourth day of this month the people of Israel were assembled with fasting and in sackcloth, and with earth on their heads. 2Then those of Israelite descent separated themselves from all foreigners, and stood and confessed their sins and the iniquities of their ancestors. 3They stood up in their place and read from the book of the law of the LORD their God for a fourth part of the day, and for another fourth they made confession and worshiped the LORD their God. 4Then Jeshua, Bani, Kadmiel, Shebaniah, Bunni, Sherebiah, Bani, and Chenani stood on the stairs of the Levites and cried out with a loud voice to the LORD their God. 5Then the Levites, Jeshua, Kadmiel, Bani, Hashabneiah, Sherebiah, Hodiah, Shebaniah, and Pethahiah, said, “Stand up and bless the LORD your God from everlasting to everlasting. Blessed be your glorious name, which is exalted above all blessing and praise.”

There is a liturgical order here that reflects on the order of sacrifice. You correct and make amends then come to the celebration. This is reflected in the service of communion, which should (and indeed, in churches with liturgies, must) have a period of confession before moving to the table.

But then the remnant put this right. The divorced their foreign wives, nor did they let their sons or daughters marry foreigners. They did not play case law to justify keeping them (Ruth was a Moabitess. Moses was married to the daughter of Jethro, an Ishmaelite). They did what they thought their duty was.

This was painful for them, and painful for their wives. But the covenant of marriage resides inside a greater covenant. Moreover, the principle remains. We are commanded to be equally yoked: to marry within the faith (but we are told to not divorce our unbelieving spouses, but instead pray for them). We are told to raise our children in the faith — indeed there is a point at which we have to obey God and not our husbands or listen to God and not heed our wives.

For when we pray for revival, we are praying for repentance, radical change, and confession. Revival comes out of tears. Joy may follow, but it begins with obedience.

The kingdom of God is not on the mountain.

This morning the post relates to the transfiguration. Peter has a response that is interesting and natural. He wants to stay there. He wants to build a camp and remain in the antechamber, seeing Jesus talk to the Prophets of old.

Matthew 17:1-8

1. Six days later, Jesus took with him Peter and James and his brother John and led them up a high mountain, by themselves. 2 And he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became dazzling white. 3 Suddenly there appeared to them Moses and Elijah, talking with him. 4 Then Peter said to Jesus, “Lord, it is good for us to be here; if you wish, I will make three dwellings here, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.” 5 While he was still speaking, suddenly a bright cloud overshadowed them, and from the cloud a voice said, “This is my Son, the Beloved; with him I am well pleased; listen to him!” 6 When the disciples heard this, they fell to the ground and were overcome by fear. 7 But Jesus came and touched them, saying, “Get up and do not be afraid.” 8And when they looked up, they saw no one except Jesus himself alone.

Calvin’s commentaries take three gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) and comments on all three. He considers that Peter was not in is correct mind, because he was afraid. The transfiguration shut his brain down.

But his [Peter's] desire was foolish; first, because he did not comprehend the design of the vision; secondly, because he absurdly put the servants on a level with their Lord; and, thirdly, he was mistaken in proposing to build fading tabernacles for men who had been already admitted to the glory of heaven and of the angels.I have said that he did not understand the design of the vision; for, while he was hearing, from the mouth of Moses and Elijah, that the time of Christ’s death was at hand, he foolishly dreamed that his present aspect, which was temporary, would endure for ever. And what if the kingdom of Christ had been confined in this way to the narrow limits of twenty or thirty feet? Where would have been the redemption of the whole world? Where would have been the communication of eternal salvation? It was also highly absurd to conceive of Moses and Elijah as companions of the Son of God, as if it had not been proper that all should be reduced to a lower rank, that he alone may have the pre-eminence. And if Peter is satisfied with his present condition, why does he suppose that earthly supports were needed by those persons, the very sight of whom, he imagined, was enough to make him happy?

Now Peter is an example and shows the contradiction that exists. In this life, we cannot handle too much reality. Our brains have difficulty comprehending the reality of our own lives, and our natural reaction to the presence of God, who is more real than this world, is fear. But we crave the peak experiences. We want to remain on the mountain.

We seek the mystic union, forgetting that in this life we cannot handle it. It is when we are resurrected we will be able to truly with unveiled faces see God. But Calvin hits another truth in his commentary. We are not to remain on the mountain, because the kingdom of God is where the people are.

We are not on this world to score some kind of spiritual or mystic points. It is not about our spirituality. It is about the Glory of God, and that comes from doing good.

It is not about today or the Church. It is about Jesus.

There has been a fair amount of pain shared around the Christian Tradosphere lately. It seems that when a blog gets to around a certain size it seems that there is a fair amount of opposition. This harassment has led to some women stopping conversations in significant subjects, taking breaks, or closing their blogs together. As an example, Hestia was driven from not only her blog but commenting last year, and I still miss her wisdom.

In part it is because the family has been politicised. There are feminists and men’s rights activists with hair trigger sensitivity. You will, inevitably, offend them. And some of the more gentle and wise among us don’t like flame wars.

I try to read the lectionary and the post on it every day. Today’s posts are about Jesus.

Revelation 19:11-16

11Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse! Its rider is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war. 12His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems; and he has a name inscribed that no one knows but himself. 13He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is called The Word of God. 14And the armies of heaven, wearing fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses. 15From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron; he will tread the wine press of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty.16On his robe and on his thigh he has a name inscribed, “King of kings and Lord of lords.”

Ignore for a second the language, which is symbolic. No one will debate who Jesus is when he returns. It will be obvious. And he will have tolerance of people who will not accept correction. In his time on earth, however there was a debate. Matthew recorded it:

Matthew 16:13-20

13Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” 14And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, but others Elijah, and still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” 15He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” 17And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father in heaven. 18And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. 19I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” 20Then he sternly ordered the disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah.

I’m not going to discuss the keys. Instead I think we need to look at why Jesus gave the reply. Peter said correctly who he was. In the end, the Church is Jesus. We believe that the holy spirit preserves the church from us humans, because we will inevitably fall into serial errors.

Now, it is the duty of the church to correct errors … (No. I am not catholic, I’m reformed. Calvin wanted a consistory around him to prevent him falling into error. We are not alone able to see our own foolishness and biases. That requires a congregation, a church, and accountability).  The difference in our time is that the world has fallen to the point where the fools are celebrated and the wise despised.

If you correct in this time, you will offend. But it is not about the culture of today. In the end, the Chuch will be with Christ. It is his. Our duty is to correct with wisdom — not to expect a happy and cheerful agreement from those in error.