I have three degrees from the University of Auckland — which is unsurprising since I grew up there. David Farrar and Chris Trotter have linked to this paper.
I have (over the years) seen much nonsense taught — generally in less competitive faculties. However, this is in law, and this course is propoganda. I argue with Crhis Trotter a lot, but this fisking is quite accurate.
A swift perusal of the course description told me all I needed to know. Here, as I feared, was a particularly stark example of what I call “Self-loathing Leftism” – that self-critical mode of left-wing analysis which takes “the politics of victimhood” out of its more familiar context in the anti-racist, feminist and gay rights movements, and extends it to the whole world.
The result is as predictable as it’s banal: an Avatar world of Goodies versus Baddies and Nature versus Technology, in which the holistic philosophy of innocent and virtuous indigenes crashes into the murderously exploitative intentions of malignant and rapacious colonisers.
Just take a look at the opening sentences of Colonialism to Globalisation’s course description:
“In the late 15th century, imperialist Europe emerged intent on exploring and possessing the New World. Fast forward through five hundred years of colonialism, capitalism, slavery, industrialisation, genocide, and international law and greet the 21st century in all its paradoxical glory.”
There’s so much wrong with this statement that it’s difficult to know where to begin.
For a start, there was no such thing as “imperialist Europe” in the late-15th century. The only entity worthy of such a description at that time was the empire of the Ottoman Turks – whose steady expansion into southern and central Europe was only halted at the gates of Vienna in 1529.
Indeed, it was the Ottomans’ interruption of the trade flows between Europe and Asia that prompted the monarchs of Portugal and Spain to sponsor voyages of exploration westward, into the Atlantic Ocean. Their hope was to access the silks and spices of the “Indies” from the sea. Nobody knew the “New World” was there!
As for Course Co-ordinator, Moshen Al Attar’s, “fast-forwarding” of the next five hundred years: what can one say?
Let’s start by listing the things he left out: the Renaissance; the Reformation; the Enlightenment; the American and French Revolutions; the exponential growth of scientific knowledge and technological expertise; the expansion of democracy; the abolition of slavery; the emancipation of women; the defeat of totalitarianism; the birth of the United Nations; the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (And this list barely scratches the surface.)
We can only assume that Mr Attar’s justification for bracketing “capitalism” with “colonialism” and “slavery” is because he sees it as being emblematic of the Western World’s lust for conquest and its colonists’ pathological need to demonstrate racial and cultural superiority.
But, to hold up capitalism as a purely Western construct is to engage in precisely the same ethno-centrism his course condemns. For most of human history it was the manufacturers and merchants of East and South Asia who controlled the global economy. And they projected their reach and protected their profits no less ruthlessly than their Western counterparts.
For a brief historical era – a period spanning less than 250 years – the West’s weapons, and their more dynamic mode of economic organisation, permitted it to expand its influence across the globe. But the same could easily be said of those emphatically non-Western expansionists, the Mongols.
Europe’s “imperialists” were not the first to practice slavery and genocide.
They were, however, the first to make both practices illegal – not only in their own jurisdictions, but by the steady development and extension of international law, across the whole planet.
via Bowalley Road.
The old moralists would have described the content of this course as being driven by one of the seven deadly sins — envy. What I am seeing is projection — the ongoing difficulties of the developing and regressing world (Somalia, Zimbabwe etc) are being projected onto Europe as sins of colonialism.
Which is Bullshit. When Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, it was an agricultural exporter. People are now starving after 30 years of mismanagement and corruption courtesy of Mugabe. The British introduction of English (the language) has allowed a trading language without ethic baggage in India (Hindi is seen as far too aligned to a certain political position to be acceptable in the south).
And finally… if a student challenges Dr Atta, citing chapter and verse and does not get the grade appropriate to his argument… Dr Atta should be held to account — or have his course revised.
Preferably be the engineering and medical faculty — where postmodernism has been found wanting.
